Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Columbus Bar Foundation

The COLUMBUS BAR FOUNDATION is a 501(c)(3) organization and is classified as a 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(a)(vi) public charity that, in partnership with the columbus bar association, is committed to promoting: access to justice by all citizens public education about the law and the judicial system innovation in the administration of…

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Crime & Legal$2.4MHealth$30kPublic Benefit$30kEducation$29kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$9k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $181,711 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $187,461 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO JUSTICE FOUNDATION$73,066
COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO$37,500
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF METROPOLITAN COLUMBUS$30,000
LAW AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$28,000
CAPITAL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL$13,145
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ALVIS INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of Columbus Bar Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 67% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Columbus Bar Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 8 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$2.3M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalEducationCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +108%
  • LA
    Law and Leadership Institute LLC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +34%
  • CM
    Community Mediation Services of Central Ohio
    9× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • PB
    PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF OHIOgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • AI
    ALVIS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

2
The Toledo Legal Aid Society

Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.

3
Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati

To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.

4
Cincinnati Bar Association

To promote professional excellence, foster justice, serve our members and educate the public.

5
Legal Aid of Western Ohio Inc

Legal aid of western ohio, inc. (lawo) is a non-profit law firm that champions equity and justice through client-centered community collaboration and transformative legal advocacy.

Crime & Legal
6
Columbus Bar Foundation

The columbus bar foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization and is classified as a 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(a)(vi) public charity that, in partnership with the columbus bar association, is committed to promoting: access to justice by all…

Philanthropy
7
Legal Aid of Southeast and Central Ohio

The mission of legal aid of southeast and central ohio (lasco) is to provide civil legal aid and advocacy to overcome unfairness and injustice to reduce poverty and increase opportunity. lasco offers free noncriminal legal help for people…

Crime & Legal
8
Justice League

The mission of Ohio Crime Victim Justice Center (OCVJC) is to ensure that the constitutional and statutory rights of Ohio crime victims are protected and enforced in state and federal jurisdictions in all 88 Ohio counties. To fulfill this…

Crime & Legal
9
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
10
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
11
Legal Aid Society of Cleveland

See schedule o.legal aid's mission is to secure justice, equity and access to opportunity for and with people who have low incomes through passionate legal representation and advocacy for systematic change.

12
Advocates for Basic Legal Equality Inc

Advocates for basic legal equality, inc. (able) is a non-profit law firm that provides high quality legal assistance in civil matters to help eligible low-income individuals and groups in western ohio achieve self-reliance, and equal…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Columbus Bar Association and the most unlike its peers is League of Women Voters of Metro Columbus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS — $1,105,984 · OtherTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUSTHE COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION — $273,894 · OtherTHE COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATIONFRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT SELF HELP RESOURCE CENTER — $54,014 · Other+3 more — $47,137 · OtherCommunity Mediation Services of Central Ohio — $312,500 · Crime & LegalCommunity Mediation Ser…OHIO LEGAL HELP — $125,000 · Crime & LegalOHIO LEGAL HELPOhio Access to Justice Foundation — $73,066 · Crime & LegalOhio Access to Justice …+1 more — $10,000 · Crime & LegalLaw and Leadership Institute LLC — $382,391 · EducationLaw and Leadership…CAPITAL UNIVERSITY — $28,848 · EducationCAPITAL UNIVERSITYLeague of Women Voters of Metro Columbus — $30,000 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF CASA OF FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO — $5,260 · Civil RightsTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Community ImprovementALVIS INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,481,029Crime & Legal$520,566Education$411,239Civil Rights$35,260Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS — $1,105,984 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetLaw and Leadership Institute LLC — $382,391 over 9y, 15% of budgetCommunity Mediation Services of Central Ohio — $312,500 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION — $273,894 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetOHIO LEGAL HELP — $125,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOhio Access to Justice Foundation — $73,066 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLeague of Women Voters of Metro Columbus — $30,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY — $28,848 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF OHIO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALVIS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHLETIC CLUB OF COLUMBUS — $8,562 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA OF FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO — $5,260 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L Brands FoundationOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L Brands Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Ohio State Bar Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Cardinal Health Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Columbus Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Columbus Bar Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Columbus Bar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph