Skip to content

· Public charity

Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

$372k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Housing & Shelter$1.9MHuman Services$1.7MEmployment$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$592kReligion$50kEducation$29k
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $113,866, the rows itemized in this filing. The $371,517 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $257,651 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$7,962
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peter E Hyland Child Care Center$23,107
Blossom Heights$12,595
The Bridge Over Troubled Waters$9,251
Tiny Toes LLC$8,993
Chinese Community Center$8,182
AAMA Inc - George I Sanchez$8,006
Galena Park ISD PEP Center$7,962
Star of Hope$6,628
Tiger Trail$6,366
Galena Park ISD Child Care Center$5,994
The Bridge Shelter$5,758
Lion Lane$5,564
Bear Blvd$5,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bethels Family Christian Academy Inc: $70k → 16%Smartie Pants Academy CTR: $10k → 16%Smartie Pants Academy Center: $12k → 16%Bridge Over Troubled Waters: $13k → 16%Bridge Over Troubled Waters: $10k → 16%The Bridge - Destiny Village: $10k → 16%The Bridge - Destiny Village: $9k → 16%The Bridge Over Troubled Waters: $9k → 16%The Bridge Shelter: $6k → 16%Bridge Over Troubled Waters: $5k → 16%Chinese Community Ctr: $17k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $15k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $14k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $14k → 16%Chinese Community Cntr: $13k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $8k → 16%ABC 123 A CAT A ME: $25k → 16%ABC 123 A CAT A ME: $25k → 16%Church Women United Care Cntr: $7k → 16%ABC123ACatMe: $9k → 16%AAMA Child Care: $16k → 16%AAMA Child Care: $15k → 16%AAMA Child Care: $14k → 16%AAMA Geo Sanchez Child Care: $10k → 16%AAMA Geo Sanchez Child Care: $9k → 16%AAMA Inc - George I Sanchez: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 24 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
184

Total granted

$1.2M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+9%

Still filing today

25%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $82k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $72k · revenue +92%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $62k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CS
    Childhood Seasons Academy #2
    3× · 2020–2024 · $192k
  • CL
    Crayola Learning Cntr
    3× · 2020–2024 · $163k
  • UC
    Unique Childcare III
    one grant, 2020 · $145k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tlc Child Care Inc

Provide christian based daycare and pre-school

Human Services
2
Giggles & Grace Early Learning Center

Giggles & grace early learning center, inc., with community, parents and teachers, is committed to providing a safe, nurturing christian environment emphasizing the total development of each child; spiritual, intellectual, emotional,…

Human Services
3
Joyful Learning Edc

In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.

Education
4
The Greatest School in West Houston

Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from

—
5
Wee Disciples Christian Academy

Wee Disciples provides a Christian atmosphere for young children to grow academically, socially, emotionally, and spiritually. We provide a safe, secure, loving environment while celebrating life through music, dance, and art.

Education
6
Denton City-County Day School

Denton City County Day School provides quality, affordable childcareto families in Denton County. Our mission is to provide qualitypre-kindergarten education and loving care to children ages 2 through 5 years. Our vision is that all DCCDS…

Human Services
7
Faith House Academy & Early Learning Center

Child care

Human Services
8
Horizons Christian Academy

Horizons christian academy is a childcare center in chester, south carolina offering exceptional care for children 8 weeks old up to 12 years of age. our childcare programs build a solid foundation for children to grow, expand their…

Philanthropy
9
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
10
Christian Center Educational Services

To train, prepare and equip our children in spiritual, academic and physical excellence for the purpose of fulfilling the lord's great commission to win the lost. matthew 28:19-20. providing faith based education and childcare.

Education
11
Beggining Child Care Center

Child care services and child preschool instruction

Education
12
Life Christian Academy Inc

Life christian academy provides christian-based care and education for children ages 6 weeks to 5th grade. it is a private, christian preschool and school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Small Steps Nurturing Center; the most unlike its peers is Small People Child Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Childhood Seasons Academy #2: $192,010 · Other+186 more: $4,846,359 · Other+186 moreCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $82,445 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS: $71,794 · Human ServicesBETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $69,930 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $62,239 · Human ServicesABC 123 HUMAN RESOURCES INC: $59,222 · Human ServicesSMARTIE PANTS ACADEMY CENTER HOUSTON: $21,576 · Human Services+1 more: $6,600 · Human ServicesGREATER SONORA MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,230 · ReligionREDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD: $24,930 · ReligionEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $10,000 · ReligionPRECIOUS STONES ACADEMY INC: $3,439 · ReligionSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $48,580 · Housing & ShelterUpward Bound Community Development Corporation: $17,550 · Health
Other$5,038,369Human Services$373,806Religion$63,599Housing & Shelter$48,580Health$17,550

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $82,445 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS: $71,794 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $69,930 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $62,239 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetABC 123 HUMAN RESOURCES INC: $59,222 over 4y, 31% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $48,580 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER SONORA MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,230 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetCHANGED Missions Ministries International Inc: $24,930 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetREDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD: $24,930 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WOMEN UNITED-CHILD CARE CENT: $6,600 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPRECIOUS STONES ACADEMY INC: $3,439 over 2y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS ↗
  • Who funds BETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ABC 123 HUMAN RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Save The Children Federation IncCT27.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Save The Children Federation Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · The Houston Fund for Social Justice and Economic Equity · Discovering Healthy Foods · The Houston Food Bank · Houston Texans Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Share Our Strength · Shell USA Company Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Collaborative for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Collaborative for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 208 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $536k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Collaborative for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph