Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coleman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MCivil Rights$125kEducation$30kHealth$25kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH$100,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$100,000
FOCUS MISSION FOUNDATION$50,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$25,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
FOCUS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%FOCUS MISSION FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%FIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW AND POLICY: $100k → 5%ST VERONICA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE: $110k → 7%GMU CATH CAMPUS MINISTRY: $10k → 24%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%FOCUS: $10k → 7%INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE: $100k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $150k → 6%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON: $100k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE: $43k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 6%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON-: $25k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 6%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON-: $25k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 6%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON-: $25k → 7%ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 6%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON: $25k → 7%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON-: $25k → 7%BISHOPS LENTEN APPEAL: $23k → 7%BISHOPS LENTEN APPEAL: $22k → 7%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON: $20k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE: $18k → 7%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON-: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Coleman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Coleman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 7 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$1.3M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+8%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $550k
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON
    5× · 2021–2025 · $255k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE
    2× · 2019–2022 · $210k

Funded once

  • IH
    INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • SV
    ST VERONICA CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • TS
    THE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $550,000 · OtherST ANDREW THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCHCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON: $255,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTONFOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE: $210,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESEFOUNDATION FOR THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE: $61,000 · OtherFOCUS MISSION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · Other+3 more: $45,000 · OtherFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY: $125,000 · Civil RightsFIDELIS CE…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,216,000Civil Rights$125,000Education$30,000Health$25,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY: $125,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coleman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coleman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coleman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Coleman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coleman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph