Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cole Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$292kHealth$195kHousing & Shelter$152kRecreation & Sports$69kYouth Development$40kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Water Street Rescue Mission$30,000
Classical Academy de Lafayette$30,000
John Hopkins Hospital$20,000
Revival & Missions$15,000
Dayspring Christian Academy$15,000
Catching Dreams LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Water Street Rescue Mission: $42k → 9%Water Street Rescue Mission: $30k → 9%Water Street Rescue Mission: $25k → 9%Water Street Rescue Mission: $20k → 9%Water Street Rescue Mission: $20k → 9%Water Street Rescue Mission: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
MO
MD
TN
SC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$684k · 8 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$684k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+80%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $190k · revenue +54%
  • WS
    WATER STREET MINISTRIES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $152k · revenue +71%
  • CA
    CLASSICAL ACADEMY DE LAFAYETTE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $95k · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • SW
    SPORTS WORLD MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $64k · revenue +39%
  • NC
    NEW COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +111%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
4
Portsmouth Christian Academy

Portsmouth christian academy exists to honor god joyfully by inspiring students to maximize their god-given potential.

—
5
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
6
Lighthouse Christian School

Lighthouse christian school exists to glorify god by providing quality, christ-centered education that will nurture students to become spiritually minded, academically versed, socially balanced, and equipped to make a positive impact in…

—
7
Christian Community School

As a support to evangelical christian families, the mission of christian community school is to provide an academically excellent, biblically integrated education which promotes christ-like character, preparing students to serve god and…

Education
8
Angleton Christian School

The mission of the school is to provide the students of acs with quality, god-centered education; training children in the way they should go, equipping students to glorify god by being a witness for jesus christ to the world through a…

Education
9
Lakeland Christian Academy Association Inc

The organization exists to provide a biblically centered educational environment so that its students may be equipped to become christ honoring members of their families, churches, and communities.

Education
10
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
11
Hunter Classical Christian School

Provide an education to children in lower and middle school using classical christian methodology.

Education
12
Victory Christian Academy

The mission of victory christian academy, in partnership with christian parents, is to provide a loving, christ-centered environment of educational excellence so that the students may develop their gifts, knowledge, skills and energies to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Country Day School; the most unlike its peers is The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Revival & Missions: $112,500 · OtherRevival & MissionsSPORTS WORLD MINISTRIES INC: $64,000 · OtherSPORTS WORLD MINISTRIES INCCatching Dreams LLC: $40,000 · OtherCatching Dreams LLCPERISH NO MORE MINISTRIES: $15,000 · OtherPERISH NO MORE MINISTRIES+3 more: $15,000 · Other+3 moreTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $190,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITALCLASSICAL ACADEMY DE LAFAYETTE: $95,000 · EducationCLASSICAL ACADEMY DE LAFA…DAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $70,937 · EducationDAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADE…LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $9,000 · EducationWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $151,500 · Human ServicesWATER STREET MINISTRIE…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$246,500Health$190,000Education$174,937Human Services$151,500Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $151,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCLASSICAL ACADEMY DE LAFAYETTE: $95,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetDAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $70,937 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL ACADEMY DE LAFAYETTE ↗
  • Who funds DAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SPORTS WORLD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cole Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cole Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cole Foundation Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph