Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

81% of Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Academy Of The New Church, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’20
2
’21
3
’22
3
’23
1
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$630kEducation$138kCivil Rights$3kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bryn Athyn College$125,000
Kempton New Church School$12,000
New Christian Bible Study$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bryn Athyn College: $125k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $12k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $20k → 11%Aven Buick: $1k → 11%Prager University Foundation: $10k → 14%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%Libertas Institute: $3k → 8%Bryn Athyn College: $113k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $12k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $20k → 11%Bethany Buick: $1k → 11%Prager University Foundation: $10k → 14%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%Libertas Institute: $944 → 8%Bryn Athyn College: $75k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $12k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $20k → 11%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%Bryn Athyn College: $70k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $12k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $20k → 11%Hillsdale College: $5k → 14%Bryn Athyn College: $69k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $12k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $10k → 11%Bryn Athyn College: $63k → 7%Kempton New Church School: $10k → 11%New Christian Bible Study: $10k → 11%General Church of the New Jerusalem: $7k → 7%Theodore Judson: $3k → 11%Bryn Athyn College: $6k → 7%John Lumsden: $2k → 11%Bryn Athyn Church School: $3k → 7%Bryn Athyn College: $2k → 7%Bryn Athyn College: $2k → 7%Bryn Athyn Church School: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 89%.

Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culturelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 7 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$203k
$8k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • LN
    Libertas Network
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • GC
    GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH: $523,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCHHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationNEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP: $100,000 · ReligionNEW CHRISTIAN …Kempton New Church School: $70,000 · OtherKempton New C…GENERAL CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: $6,575 · OtherGENERAL CHURC…Bryn Athyn Church School: $3,550 · Other+6 more: $12,200 · Other+6 moreLibertas Network: $3,444 · Public Benefit
Education$578,000Religion$100,000Other$92,325Public Benefit$3,444

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH: $523,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP: $100,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLibertas Network: $3,444 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF THE NEW CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds NEW CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY CORP ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Libertas Network ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cole Foundation for Renewing the Culture’s filings →

    More from the funding graph