Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cold Stream Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$100kEducation$37kAnimals$25kYouth Development$15kCrime & Legal$14kHealth$10kScience & Tech$10kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$370k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER$10,000
NEMBA$7,000
NO OFF SEASON FELLOWSHIP$5,000
MISFITS REHAB$5,000
INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY$2,500
BIG BROTHERBIG SISTER$2,000
COLT TRUST$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
THE HAVEN$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MD
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 16 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$179k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+24%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesScience & TechHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +135%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +105%
  • BA
    BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • CG
    CHILDREN GARDEN OF LEARNING IN VAIL COLORADO
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • PC
    PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
11
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Junior Tennis & Learning of Trenton Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Colt Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER: $70,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS MISSION CENTERBAY LIFE CHURCH: $14,500 · OtherBAY LIFE CHURCHBIG BROTHERBIG SISTER: $12,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERBIG SISTERWOODS ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $10,000 · OtherMISFITS REHAB: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherCHILDREN GARDEN OF LEARNING IN VAIL COLORADO: $7,500 · OtherNEMBA: $7,000 · Other+21 more: $64,200 · Other+21 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationBAYSIDE ACADEMY INC: $4,500 · EducationTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Science & TechFALMOUTH CONSERVATION TRUST DBA FALMOUTH LAND TRUST: $2,500 · EnvironmentPrinceton Future Inc: $2,000 · Environment
Other$204,700Education$14,500Human Services$14,000Public Benefit$5,000Animals$5,000Science & Tech$4,500Environment$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Colt Trust Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 34% of budgetBAYSIDE ACADEMY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChebeague & Cumberland Land Trust: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFALMOUTH CONSERVATION TRUST DBA FALMOUTH LAND TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPrinceton Future Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Colt Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH CONSERVATION TRUST DBA FALMOUTH LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Princeton Future Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JUNIOR TENNIS & LEARNING OF TRENTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cold Stream Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cold Stream Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cold Stream Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cold Stream Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cold Stream’s filings →

More from the funding graph