Skip to content
Codeorg at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Codeorg

Code.org is an education innovation nonprofit dedicated to expanding access to computer science, and increasing participation by young women and underrepresented groups.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
27
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$8.3M
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $1,064,683, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,092,184 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,501 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $621k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $409k
$30,400
Median grant
27
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$91,250
CODE IN THE SCHOOLS$82,500
SACRED HEART$68,122
MOUSE$60,000
OKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER INC$56,059
CSFORMA INC$51,000
THE FRIDAY INSTITUTE$48,000
MAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC$44,200
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$43,500
EDUCATE MAINE$42,500
NEW MEXICO COMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE$39,000
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$35,400
ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTER$34,500
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$34,000
GEORGIA TECH - CEISMC$34,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $104k → 15%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $78k → 15%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $76k → 15%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $48k → 15%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $41k → 15%BATTELLE EDUCATION: $26k → 15%TENNESSEE STEM INNOVATION NETWORK (BATTELLE EDUCATION): $23k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 50 repeat orgs$552k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
14

Total granted

$7.6M
$531k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+86%

Still filing today

56%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesScience & TechCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BATTELLE EDUCATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $396k · revenue +256%
  • AC
    AVID CENTER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $366k · revenue +41%
  • ML
    MINDSPARK LEARNING
    6× · 2019–2025 · $296k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • MM
    MSET MARYLAND SOCIETY FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • PS
    PUGET SOUND EDUCATIONAL SERVICE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $78k
  • 9D
    9 DOTS COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $76k · revenue +139%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
2
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
4
Michigan Virtual University

Maximize learning and teaching by bringing together the best in people and technology.

Education
5
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
6
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
10
Literacy Design Collaborative Inc

Seeks to ensure that every student in america graduates from (continued on schedule o) high school with the literacy skills necessary for success in college and career. ldc is a teacher-created instructional design system that transforms…

Education
11
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Computer Science Alliance; the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $510,695 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $316,250 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $264,500 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYAlaska Council of School Administrators: $211,540 · OtherKENTUCKY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORP: $185,670 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $178,745 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $175,100 · OtherLEARNING TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $168,200 · OtherRIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION: $164,841 · OtherTHE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY: $163,700 · OtherMAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $139,800 · Other+27 more: $1,545,017 · Other+27 moreAVID CENTER: $365,900 · EducationAVID CENTERCSforMA Inc: $336,000 · EducationCSforMA IncMOUSE INC: $334,526 · EducationMOUSE INCMINDSPARK LEARNING: $296,200 · EducationMINDSPARK LEARNINGOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER: $289,479 · EducationOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTERCOMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE: $226,700 · EducationCOMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCESACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $196,622 · EducationSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATEDEducate Maine: $186,180 · EducationEducate MaineCODE IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $155,000 · EducationMarquette University: $150,190 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $127,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $105,500 · Education+9 more: $384,263 · Education+9 moreARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER: $174,500 · Arts & CultureORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $130,198 · Arts & CultureUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC: $82,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $56,000 · Arts & CultureBATTELLE EDUCATION: $395,988 · Human ServicesSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $114,650 · Community ImprovementTHE NEW BOHEMIAN INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $113,760 · PhilanthropyLUMITY: $90,990 · Science & Tech
Other$4,024,058Education$3,153,560Arts & Culture$442,698Human Services$395,988Community Improvement$114,650Philanthropy$113,760Science & Tech$90,990

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBATTELLE EDUCATION: $395,988 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetAVID CENTER: $365,900 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCSforMA Inc: $336,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetMOUSE INC: $334,526 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetMINDSPARK LEARNING: $296,200 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER: $289,479 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE: $226,700 over 6y, 18% of budgetAlaska Council of School Administrators: $211,540 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $196,622 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEducate Maine: $186,180 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetKENTUCKY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORP: $185,670 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER: $174,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCODE IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $155,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetMarquette University: $150,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $139,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $130,198 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $127,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $114,650 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NEW BOHEMIAN INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $113,760 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $105,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUMITY: $90,990 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $88,758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC: $82,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL STEM2 HUB INC: $74,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $56,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAF: $52,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCODE SAVVY: $48,600 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetZIP CODE WILMINGTON INC: $28,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHillsborough Education Foundation Inc: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BATTELLE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds AVID CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CSforMA Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MINDSPARK LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Council of School Administrators ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Educate Maine ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORP ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CODE IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds MAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW BOHEMIAN INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LUMITY ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds 9 DOTS COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California County Sup…Scratch FoundationShare Our StrengthRockefeller Philanthr…New Venture FundTides FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California County SuperintendentsCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California County Superintendents · Scratch Foundation · Share Our Strength · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Codeorg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Codeorg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oklahoma Public School Resource Center: 67% of income from government
  • CSforMA Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Zip Code Wilmington Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Orlando Science Centerinc: 4% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Codeorg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home