Skip to content
Code for India Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Code for India Inc

Code for india is focused on building applications that empower marginalized communities with technology based soultions to solve public service problems.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Science & Tech$36kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$22kInternational$21kEducation$21kHealth$11kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $61,603, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,603 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$19,603
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA'S FRONTIER FUND$36,000
ISKCON LOS ANGELES$19,603
RAYWA$5,000
THE PEACE WARRIOR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $21k → 8%BAPS CHARITY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
2
Shadhika Project

Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…

—
3
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
4
Bharat Swabhiman Overseas Inc

The mission of bharat swabhiman overseas inc is to organize and promote yoga, ayurveda and vedic sciences, and to help the communitiy so all children,adults and families have the same chance to succeed in school and in life by providing…

Arts & Culture
5
World Hindu Foundation of America

World hindu foundation of america, inc. endeavors to promote networking amongst practitioners of sanatan hindu dharma through community-oriented social, spiritual, cultural, intellectual and educational activities.

Public Benefit
6
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
8
Ignite Asha

Improve the human rights and self worth of south asian women and children on a global level.

International
9
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
10
Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh U S a Inc

The Mission of the Hindu Swayaamsevak Sangh USA, Inc. is: * to give primacy to Humanitarian and Spiritual values of life; * to create and promote a better understanding and more friendly relationship between races, nations and through…

—
11
National Ayurvedic Medical Association

The National Ayurvedic Medical Association represents the Ayurvedic profession in the United States of America. Our mission is to preserve, protect, promote and advance the consciousness-based philosophy, knowledge, science and practice of…

Community Improvement
12
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baps Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Raising Awareness of Young Women With Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFF FOUNDATION: $36,000 · InternationalAFF FOUNDATIONINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA: $29,611 · OtherINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY F…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherSewa International Inc: $21,000 · Human ServicesSewa International …BAPS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INCSRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · ReligionSRI RAMA FOUNDA…Advaita Society-Mount Madonna School: $21,000 · EducationAdvaita Society…HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 · Health
International$36,000Other$30,611Human Services$26,000Religion$21,000Education$21,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFF FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAdvaita Society-Mount Madonna School: $21,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSewa International Inc: $21,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRAISING AWARENESS OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH AUTISM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Code for India Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Code for India Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Code for India’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home