Skip to content
Coastline Elderly Services Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Coastline Elderly Services Inc

Enhance the lives of seniors, caregivers and those with similar needs by assisting them to remain independent through a range of quality services.

$38M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$492kHealth$432kCrime & Legal$431kEnvironment$220kPublic Benefit$81kArts & Culture$73kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $189,996, the rows itemized in this filing. The $38,093,817 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,903,821 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
$10,419
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC$41,080
IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER$26,520
NEW BEDFORD COUNCIL ON AGING$22,917
MOXIE MOBILITY TRAIN$16,787
MASHPEE OLD INDIAN$15,000
PACE$11,565
PROJECT INDEPENDENCE$10,419
FAIRHAVEN COUNCIL ON AGING$9,253
BUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPY$8,441
TOWN OF DARTMOUTH$8,281
YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MA$7,446
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC$6,384
NEW BEDFORD ART MUSEUM & ART CENTER INC$5,903
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $33k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $33k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $31k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $29k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $27k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $9k → 8%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $24k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $6k → 8%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $24k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $24k → 11%IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $22k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $14k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $6k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $6k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $6k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 18 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +151%
  • PA
    PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +146%
  • MI
    MOLIFE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $109k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $74k · revenue +19%
  • BB
    BUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPY
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • TO
    Town of Marion
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeast Center for Independent Living Inc

The philosophy of independent living, maintains that individuals with disabilities have the right to choose services and make decisions for themselves. this belief is the foundation and guiding principle in all of the policies and…

Housing & Shelter
2
New England Business Associates Inc

Support employment for disabled individuals.

—
3
Coastline Elderly Services Inc

Enhance the lives of seniors, caregivers and those with similar needs by assisting them to remain independent through a range of quality services.

Human Services
4
Metrowest Center for Independent Living Inc

Mwcil enhances the full participation of persons with disabilities in the community.

—
5
Better Community Living Inc

The organization provides residential and community services to developmentally disabled individuals to allow them to live a full and active life.

Health
6
Northeast Independent Living Services

To enhance the rights & independence of people with disabilities to actively participate in their communities & to live self-determined lives.

Unclassified
7
Nantucket Community Service Ii Inc

Provide low income elderly housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Northeast Independent Living Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services to people with all disabilities who wish to live independently in the community.

—
9
The Shared Living Collaborative Inc

To provide services and residential support to individuals with disabilities

Human Services
10
Southeastern Massachusetts Home Health Aides Inc

Homecare services and home health aide services.

Human Services
11
Nantucket Center for Elder Affairs Inc

Provide services to the elderly

—
12
Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council Inc

Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council's mission is to promote changes wthin communities in Rhode Island that encourages, inspires and makes possible for individuals with disabilities to create, pursue and achieve lives that are…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mashpee Old Indian Meetinghouse Authority Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH COASTAL LEGAL SERVICES INC: $356,659 · OtherSOUTH COASTAL LEGAL SERVICES INCCITY OF MELROSE: $203,136 · OtherCITY OF MELROSEPEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC: $164,758 · OtherPEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INCMASHPEE OLD INDIAN MEETINGHOUSE AUTHORITY INC: $121,834 · OtherMASHPEE OLD INDIAN MEETINGHOUSE AUTHORITY INCYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $72,992 · OtherYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCBUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPY: $66,529 · OtherBUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPYVISTING DENTAL HYGENIST: $41,387 · Other+11 more: $159,218 · Other+11 moreIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $245,767 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTAN…COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $37,349 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CONNECTION…PROJECT INDEPENDENCE SERVICES INC: $27,829 · Human ServicesPROJECT INDEPENDENCE…MOLIFE INC: $108,941 · EmploymentSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $74,385 · Crime & LegalCommunity Nurse Inc: $53,596 · Health
Other$1,186,513Human Services$310,945Employment$108,941Crime & Legal$74,385Health$53,596

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $245,767 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetPEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC: $164,758 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOLIFE INC: $108,941 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $74,385 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $72,992 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Nurse Inc: $53,596 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $37,349 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT INDEPENDENCE SERVICES INC: $27,829 over 3y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds MASHPEE OLD INDIAN MEETINGHOUSE AUTHORITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Nurse Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT INDEPENDENCE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER NEW BEDFORD ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Art Museum New Bedford Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southcoast Community …Bristol County Saving…Association for the R…United Way of Greater…Combined Jewish Phila…First Citizens Charit…Island Foundation IncBoston Foundation IncFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Southcoast Community Foundation IncMA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Association for the Relief of Aged Women of New Bedford · United Way of Greater New Bedford Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Island Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coastline Elderly Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coastline Elderly Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Molife Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Community Connections Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Ywca of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Immigrants' Assistance Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coastline Elderly Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home