· Public charity
Coastline Elderly Services Inc
Enhance the lives of seniors, caregivers and those with similar needs by assisting them to remain independent through a range of quality services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $189,996 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $38,093,817 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,903,821 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC | $41,080 |
| IMMIGRANTS ASSISTANCE CENTER | $26,520 |
| NEW BEDFORD COUNCIL ON AGING | $22,917 |
| MOXIE MOBILITY TRAIN | $16,787 |
| MASHPEE OLD INDIAN | $15,000 |
| PACE | $11,565 |
| PROJECT INDEPENDENCE | $10,419 |
| FAIRHAVEN COUNCIL ON AGING | $9,253 |
| BUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPY | $8,441 |
| TOWN OF DARTMOUTH | $8,281 |
| YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MA | $7,446 |
| COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC | $6,384 |
| NEW BEDFORD ART MUSEUM & ART CENTER INC | $5,903 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IAIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +151%
- PAPEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +146%
- MIMOLIFE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $109k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- SCSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $74k · revenue +19%
- BBBUZZARDS BAY SPEECH THERAPYone grant, 2017 · $6k
- TOTown of Marionone grant, 2021 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philosophy of independent living, maintains that individuals with disabilities have the right to choose services and make decisions for themselves. this belief is the foundation and guiding principle in all of the policies and…
Support employment for disabled individuals.
Enhance the lives of seniors, caregivers and those with similar needs by assisting them to remain independent through a range of quality services.
Mwcil enhances the full participation of persons with disabilities in the community.
The organization provides residential and community services to developmentally disabled individuals to allow them to live a full and active life.
To enhance the rights & independence of people with disabilities to actively participate in their communities & to live self-determined lives.
Provide low income elderly housing
To provide advocacy and services to people with all disabilities who wish to live independently in the community.
To provide services and residential support to individuals with disabilities
Homecare services and home health aide services.
Provide services to the elderly
Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council's mission is to promote changes wthin communities in Rhode Island that encourages, inspires and makes possible for individuals with disabilities to create, pursue and achieve lives that are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mashpee Old Indian Meetinghouse Authority Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
- Who funds MASHPEE OLD INDIAN MEETINGHOUSE AUTHORITY INC ↗
- Who funds MOLIFE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Nurse Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT INDEPENDENCE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW BEDFORD ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Art Museum New Bedford Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Association for the Relief of Aged Women of New Bedford · United Way of Greater New Bedford Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Island Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coastline Elderly Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Molife Inc — 95% of income from government
- Community Connections Inc — 76% of income from government
- Ywca of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc — 28% of income from government
- Immigrants' Assistance Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.