Skip to content

· Public charity

Coalition of Oc Community Clinics

To provide services including information and technical assistance which support member agencies in fulfilling their missions such as health care planning and public policy education on issues related to serving medically and under-insured individuals in orange county.

$85k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$1.8MHuman Services$59k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$55,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFETY NET CONNECT INC$55,000
E20HEALTH$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SERVE THE PEOPLE INC: $24k → 10%SERVE THE PEOPLE: $18k → 10%SERVE THE PEOPLE: $11k → 10%SERVE THE PEOPLE: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +69% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$1.5M
$311k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+69%

Still filing today

56%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $512k · revenue +524%
  • SI
    SOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $416k · revenue +99%
  • HF
    Hurtt Family Health Clinic Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $99k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $108k
  • MC
    MULTI-ETHNIC COLLABORATIVE COMMUNIT
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • CH
    CAMINO HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $56k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC: $416,439 · OtherSOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INCFRIENDS OF FAMILIES HEALTH: $116,728 · OtherFRIENDS OF FAMILIES HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $108,092 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNAN HOA HEALTH CENTER: $90,118 · OtherNAN HOA HEALTH CENTERNHAN HOA HEALTH CENTER: $87,306 · OtherNHAN HOA HEALTH CENTERFAMILIES TOGETHER OF OC: $70,749 · OtherFAMILIES TOGETHER OF OCMULTI-ETHNIC COLLABORATIVE COMMUNIT: $60,000 · OtherCAMINO HEALTH CENTER: $55,646 · OtherSAFETY NET CONNECT INC: $55,000 · OtherE20HEALTH: $40,000 · Other+8 more: $87,461 · Other+8 moreKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $511,728 · HealthKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INCHurtt Family Health Clinic Inc: $98,833 · HealthHurtt Family Health Clinic IncSERVE THE PEOPLE INC: $58,891 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $32,404 · Philanthropy
Other$1,187,539Health$610,561Human Services$58,891Philanthropy$32,404

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $511,728 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC: $416,439 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHurtt Family Health Clinic Inc: $98,833 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSERVE THE PEOPLE INC: $58,891 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCAMINO HEALTH CENTER: $55,646 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $32,404 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLAND INTEGRATED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hurtt Family Health Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds SERVE THE PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMINO HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition of Oc Community Clinics funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition of Oc Community Clinics. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $7.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coalition of Oc Community Clinics’ filings →

    More from the funding graph