Skip to content

· Public charity

Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco

To end homelessness in pasco county through technical assistance, supportive services and educational opportunities

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$741kHuman Services$555kHousing & Shelter$500kFood & Nutrition$375kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $201k
$79,624
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SWORD AND THE SPOON$121,342
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$79,624
COMMUNITY HOPE PROJECT (CHIPZ)$16,865
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $118k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $107k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $66k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $19k → 11%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALTERNATIVES: $24k → 11%ACE OPPORTUNITIES: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$1.8M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-8%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SWORD AND THE SPOON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $375k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    3× · 2019–2023 · $316k
  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $311k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2022 · $303k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DOSP
    one grant, 2022 · $111k
  • YA
    YOUTH AND FAMILY ALTERNATIVES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SWORD AND THE SPOON: $374,647 · OtherTHE SWORD AND THE SPOONCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $316,471 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL: $302,826 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DE PAULST VINCENT DE PAUL: $260,420 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULFLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INC: $168,210 · OtherFLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INCIndividual grant recipient: $122,710 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES DOSP: $111,277 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DOSPRESTORED HOPE: $95,276 · OtherSAMARITAN PROJECT: $86,288 · Other+4 more: $39,340 · OtherMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $310,748 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINI…YOUTH AND FAMILY ALTERNATIVES INC: $23,850 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY …ACE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $12,600 · Human ServicesOne Community Now Inc: $75,000 · Religion
Other$1,877,465Human Services$347,198Religion$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $310,748 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INC: $168,210 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetOne Community Now Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALTERNATIVES INC: $23,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $12,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES - ARBOR VILLAS INC: $8,675 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds One Community Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds ACE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES - ARBOR VILLAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Ace Opportunities Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Youth and Family Alternatives Inc: 2% of income from government
  • One Community Now Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco?

Find your warmest path to Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coalition for the Homeless of Pasco’s filings →

More from the funding graph