Skip to content

· Private foundation

Co-Tuw Marion &Amp Miriam Rose

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$225kFood & Nutrition$110kEducation$98kHousing & Shelter$95kHuman Services$75kCommunity Improvement$75kRecreation & Sports$60kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH HOME INC$35,000
EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS$20,000
KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK$20,000
ARKANSAS FOODBANK$20,000
ACCESS GROUP INC$15,000
THE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
APPLE SEEDS INC$10,000
METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH$10,000
IMAGINE AND BELIEVE FOUNDATION$10,000
ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%APPLE SEEDS INC: $10k → 14%THE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15k → 17%THE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 17%THE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 17%THE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 17%OUR HOUSE INC: $20k → 17%OUR HOUSE INC: $20k → 17%OUR HOUSE INC: $20k → 17%OUR HOUSE INC: $20k → 17%EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS: $20k → 17%OUR HOUSE INC: $15k → 17%EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS: $10k → 17%VILLAGE PLACE: $10k → 17%EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $10k → 17%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%CAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $20k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $15k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $15k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $15k → 17%CAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $15k → 17%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $15k → 17%CAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $15k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $10k → 17%METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH: $10k → 17%CAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $25k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $20k → 17%KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK: $20k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $15k → 17%KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK: $20k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $15k → 17%KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK: $20k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $15k → 17%KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK: $15k → 17%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $10k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 17%UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF AR: $20k → 17%ACCESS GROUP INC: $20k → 17%ACCESS GROUP INC: $15k → 17%ACCESS GROUP INC: $15k → 17%ACCESS GROUP INC: $15k → 17%ACCESS GROUP INC: $10k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $35k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$788k · 14 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$788k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+111%

Still filing today

93%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARKANSAS FOODBANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +89%
  • AG
    ACCESS GROUP INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF AR
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • VP
    VILLAGE PLACEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +111%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Enterprises for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

Teaching work skills and daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
2
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
3
Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

Housing & Shelter
4
East Arkansas Youth Services Inc

The mission of east arkansas youth services, inc. is to provide a comprehensive continuum of care to include therapeutic, educational, and advocacy services, to youth and their families, and to instill motivation and courage to empower…

Human Services
5
Ability Tree of Arkansas Inc

Coming alongside families of children with special needs and equipping organizations through recreation, education, support, and training (r.e.s.t.).

Human Services
6
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis, Inc. sees a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children. They provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and…

Health
7
United Methodist Children's Home

To provide quality compassionate behavioral healthcare services to children and families of arkansas through a comprehensive continuum of programs which include residential treatment center care, therapeutic group home care, emergency…

Human Services
8
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
9
Independent Case Management Inc

Icm provides various support services to individuals with developmental disabilities so they can remain in their community of choice with an enhanced quality of life.

Human Services
10
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
11
Dana's House Inc

To provide care for needy children and young adults.

Housing & Shelter
12
Rainbow of Challenges Inc

Discovering opportunities that inspire lives...whatever it takes!

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Imagine and Believe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH INC: $80,000 · HealthMETHODIST FAMILY HEALTH INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $60,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF A…YOUTH HOME INC: $50,000 · HealthYOUTH HOME INCEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $40,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS ARKANSASBaptist Health Foundation Inc: $35,000 · HealthBaptist Health Foundation IncOUR HOUSE INC: $95,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCTHE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $45,000 · OtherTHE ARKANSAS SYMPHONY…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF AR: $20,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY…ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $100,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS FOOD…ACCESS GROUP INC: $85,000 · EducationACCESS GROUP …ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $13,000 · EducationARKANSAS IMAG…KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK KIWANIS ACTIVITIES INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementKIWANIS ACT…VILLAGE PLACE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE PLA…CAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsIMMERSE ARKANSAS: $35,000 · Human ServicesIMAGINE AND BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentAPPLE SEEDS INC: $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$265,000Other$160,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Education$98,000Community Improvement$85,000Recreation & Sports$60,000Human Services$35,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetACCESS GROUP INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMETHODIST FAMILY HEALTH INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK KIWANIS ACTIVITIES INC: $75,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH HOME INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIMMERSE ARKANSAS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIMAGINE AND BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $13,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetVILLAGE PLACE: $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable AndTX28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Rebsamen Fund · The Hussman Foundation · Heart of Arkansas United Way · The Brown Foundation Inc · John R & Judy W Fletcher Family Foundation · Trinity Foundation · The Robert C and Anne a Hickman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Co-Tuw Marion &Amp Miriam Rose funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Co-Tuw Marion &Amp Miriam Rose. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Co-Tuw Marion &Amp Miriam Rose’s filings →

    More from the funding graph