Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$200k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
38%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$80,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 8
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$4.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 38% of the organizations Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn funded were first-time grantees, receiving 35% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$200k0%
FY20248$200k38%
FY20237$145k14%
FY20227$130k86%
FY20217$125k57%
FY20207$100kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$495kArts & Culture$155kHuman Services$93kScience & Tech$45kReligion$43kHealth$35kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
OK
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of California Berkeley Foundation$145,00040%
Birthday Blessings$82,500317%
Holy Names High School$55,0006n/a
Children's Book Project$35,00025%
The Head Royce School$30,00030%
Mechanics' Institute$25,00012%
Morristown-Beard School$10,00010%
Celebrate Birthdays Inc$10,000110%
Smile Train Inc$5,00010%
California Alumni Association$5,00010%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($498k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of California Berkeley Foundation: $145,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBirthday Blessings: $82,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetChildren's Book Project: $35,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetThe Head Royce School: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMechanics' Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMorristown-Beard School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCelebrate Birthdays Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetSmile Train Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Alumni Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn with peer funders

About Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn

How much does Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn give?
Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn reported 6 grants totaling $200,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 8 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (55%), Arts & Culture (17%), Human Services (10%).
Who are Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: University of California Berkeley Foundation ($145k), Birthday Blessings ($83k), Holy Names High School ($55k).
Does Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The San Francisco Foundation, Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn based?
Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Co Tua Leroe Family Char Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph