Skip to content
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

$71M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$5.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$29MPhilanthropy$21MEducation$13MCommunity Improvement$4.3MHealth$3.6MPublic Benefit$2.6MCivil Rights$2.2MArts & Culture$2.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $33,545,648, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,156,815 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,611,167 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $464k
  • $250k+21 grants · $33M
$590,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$273M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE ACRE FUND$5,833,333
NEW VENTURE FUND$5,522,990
DASRA$3,885,900
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$3,100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO ECHO INSTITUTE$2,146,685
ARMMAN-USA$2,000,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$1,693,095
ARROW$1,050,000
LAST MILE HEALTH$1,000,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$966,475
ID INSIGHT INC$894,000
PLANETREAD$883,386
ASPIRE INDIA INC$590,000
CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT$520,896
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAN SAHAS SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY: $3.0M → 14%PEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL: $2.7M → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $521k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $295k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
DE
NM
TN
DC
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $38M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$14M · 37% · 20 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$10M · 28% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

South Asia$4.9M · 13% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

North America (Canada and Mexico)$4.1M · 11% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

South America$3.2M · 8% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

East Asia and the Pacific$915k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 16 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$37M
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+4%

Still filing today

94%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13M · revenue +43%
  • PC
    PEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5.7M · revenue +24% · 62% of their budget
  • OG
    OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +615% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $2.0M
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -28%
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $866k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
3
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
4
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
Fuller Project for International Reporting Inc

The fuller project is the global newsroom dedicated to groundbreaking reporting that catalyzes positive change for women.

International
9
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
10
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
11
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Government Partnership Secretariat; the most unlike its peers is Armman-Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
19/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE ACRE FUND: $12,833,333 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDDASRA: $3,885,900 · InternationalDASRAID INSIGHT INC: $2,707,000 · InternationalID INSIGHT INCARMMAN-USA: $2,000,000 · InternationalARMMAN-USAOPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT: $1,500,000 · InternationalOPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIATARROW: $1,050,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $1,000,000 · International+5 more: $2,580,700 · International+5 moreNEW VENTURE FUND: $16,427,249 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $7,889,766 · EducationMassachusetts I…PLANETREAD: $2,171,266 · EducationPLANETREADINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN JUDGES: $1,001,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL A…+1 more: $200,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $3,553,407 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW …LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $3,100,000 · OtherLWALA COMMUNITY AL…INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: $2,000,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BANK…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $600,000 · OtherTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · OtherASPIRE INDIA INC: $820,867 · OtherASPIRE INDIA INCFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $437,500 · OtherTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC: $669,500 · Other+7 more: $1,124,684 · Other+7 morePEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,700,000 · Human ServicesPEOPLE'S …CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $815,896 · Human ServicesCENTER FO…LAST MILE HEALTH: $2,800,000 · HealthWORLDBEING INC: $300,000 · HealthCENTER FOR JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: $988,083 · Crime & LegalINSTITUTE FOR AFRICAN WOMEN IN LAW: $640,000 · Crime & LegalLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $485,000 · Crime & LegalINITIATIVE FOR MEDICINES ACCESS & KNOWLEDGE (I-MAK) INC: $250,000 · Crime & Legal
International$27,556,933Environment$16,427,249Education$11,262,032Other$12,805,958Human Services$6,515,896Health$3,100,000Crime & Legal$2,363,083

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $16,427,249 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $12,833,333 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $7,889,766 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,700,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetDASRA: $3,885,900 over 1y, 13% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $2,800,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetID INSIGHT INC: $2,707,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetARMMAN-USA: $2,000,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetOPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT: $1,500,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetARROW: $1,050,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN JUDGES: $1,001,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCENTER FOR JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: $988,083 over 2y, 53% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP: $866,350 over 1y, 12% of budgetASPIRE INDIA INC: $820,867 over 2y, 24% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $815,896 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC: $669,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE: $636,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLwala Community Alliance: $500,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $485,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $437,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOC FOR FEMINIST ECONOM: $335,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetWORLDBEING INC: $300,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION: $290,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR MEDICINES ACCESS & KNOWLEDGE (I-MAK) INC: $250,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR IMPACT EVALUATION INC: $245,556 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEMPOWER-THE EMERGING MARKETS FOUNDATION: $243,350 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWomen Deliver Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $183,680 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationThe William & Flora H…Wellspring Philanthro…The Ford FoundationFoundation to Promote…New Venture FundConrad N Hilton Found…Skoll FundThe Skoll FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationOpen Society Institute
Gates FoundationWA29.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · New Venture Fund · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Skoll Fund · The Skoll Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Open Society Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc?

Find your warmest path to Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home