Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cm Capital Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$222k
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$533kEducation$208kHuman Services$126kArts & Culture$80kRecreation & Sports$13kAnimals$12kYouth Development$8kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVENIDAS$50,000
MONTEREY BAY CHINESE ASSOCIATION$50,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION$40,000
AVENIDAS$7,500
CAL STATE MONTEREY BAY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$5,000
UC REGENTS$5,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE$5,000
UC DAVIS$5,000
CALTECH$2,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HUNTSVILLE$2,500
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AVENIDAS: $50k → 8%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $100 → 19%HSU FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $350 → 10%AMERICAN BEIYINU ALUMNAE FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%AVENIDAS: $20k → 8%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%AVENIDAS: $8k → 8%AVENIDAS: $8k → 8%AVENIDAS: $8k → 8%AVENIDAS: $5k → 8%AVENIDAS: $5k → 8%AVENIDAS: $5k → 8%CHILD AND FAMILY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $250 → 7%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$857k · 60 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
63

Total granted

$857k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    4× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +63%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • Northwestern University
    4× · 2019–2022 · $10k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -54%
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
University of Redlands

We welcome, educate, and empower a diverse community of learners for lives of meaning, impact, and joy.

Education
9
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
10
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
11
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
12
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Monterey Bay Chinese Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/91
Grantees still filing
52/91
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $221,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANC…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $11,750 · Education+27 more: $87,526 · Education+27 moreLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $256,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR…+8 more: $11,450 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $35,000 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S…Individual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…UC REGENTS: $15,000 · OtherUC REGENTSCAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · OtherCAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10,000 · OtherUC DAVIS: $10,000 · OtherORTOP: $8,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $7,852 · Other+71 more: $107,020 · Other+71 moreAVENIDAS: $117,500 · Human ServicesAVENIDASSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $6,000 · Human Services+6 more: $3,800 · Human ServicesMonterey Bay Chinese Association: $50,000 · Arts & CultureContemporary Asian Theatre Scene Inc: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $5,450 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsOUTWARD BOUND CALIFORNIA: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $200 · Recreation & SportsFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $2,550 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,013 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $668 · Food & Nutrition
Education$320,276Health$267,450Other$234,372Human Services$127,300Arts & Culture$71,450Recreation & Sports$12,200Food & Nutrition$5,231

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $256,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $221,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAVENIDAS: $117,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $11,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $10,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALTECH Y: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetContemporary Asian Theatre Scene Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $6,725 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALMA EQUINE: $6,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetPALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $5,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON ROBOTICS TOURNAMENT & OUTREACH PROGRAM: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetETHIOPIA READS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSUPER JOEY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $2,800 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $2,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIDEON HAUSNER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $2,409 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,013 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGO2 For Lung Cancer: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBURLINGAME COMMUNITY FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLEHANDS GROUP: $1,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRedwood City Little League Inc: $1,350 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLafayette Partners in Education: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTINA ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern California: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets In Need: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChopsticks Alley Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
  • Who funds Monterey Bay Chinese Association ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds THE CALTECH Y ↗
  • Who funds Contemporary Asian Theatre Scene Inc ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ALMA EQUINE ↗
  • Who funds PALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON ROBOTICS TOURNAMENT & OUTREACH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ETHIOPIA READS ↗
  • Who funds SUPER JOEY FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA31.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Agilent Technologies Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Mentor Graphics Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cm Capital Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cm Capital Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cm Capital Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cm Capital Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cm Capital’s filings →

More from the funding graph