Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clifford Carney Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$93kFood & Nutrition$45kYouth Development$45kHuman Services$20kInternational$10kReligion$10kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lambs Farm$30,000
Our Childrens Famiy Homestead$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Heart Haven Outreach$20,000
USO Fund$10,000
St Judes Childrens Research Founda$10,000
Marianjoy Foundation$10,000
Wounded Warrior Project$10,000
Doctors Without Boarders$10,000
Wellness House$7,500
Advocate Aurora Health Foundation$7,500
Habitat for Humanity Chicago$5,000
Ready Set Ride$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $10k → 14%Ready Set Ride: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 4 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$118k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+61%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAMBS FARM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +107%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k
  • WH
    Wellness House
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • OC
    Our Childrens Famiy Homestead
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • HH
    HEART HAVEN OUTREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +61%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOur Childrens Famiy Homestead: $25,000 · OtherOur Childrens Famiy HomesteadGood Samaritan Hospital: $15,000 · OtherGood Samaritan HospitalMARIANJOY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMARIANJOY FOUNDATIONUSO Fund: $10,000 · OtherUSO FundSt Judes Childrens Research Founda: $10,000 · OtherSt Judes Childrens Research FoundaAdvocate Aurora Health Foundation: $7,500 · OtherAdvocate Aurora Health FoundationTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $45,000 · EmploymentTHE LAMBS FARM INCWellness House: $22,500 · HealthWellness Ho…HEART HAVEN OUTREACH: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEART HAV…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesREADY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY: $2,500 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$112,500Employment$45,000Health$22,500Youth Development$20,000Human Services$12,500International$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWellness House: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEART HAVEN OUTREACH: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds HEART HAVEN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds READY SET RIDE THERAPEUTIC RECREATION FACILITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clifford Carney Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clifford Carney Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clifford Carney’s filings →

More from the funding graph