Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cleveland Rotary Foundation

Providing funding to further charitable and educational activities throughout northeastern ohio

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$66kHealth$31kInternational$30kCivil Rights$15kYouth Development$15kHuman Services$11kCommunity Improvement$6kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $47,768 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $87,958 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,190 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACEJAM FOUNDATION$15,320
THE BOWMAN CENTER$7,500
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$7,500
FOOTPATH FOUNDATION$6,000
NANZE CHILDREN SERVICES$6,000
ACHIEVEMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN$5,448
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THEA BOWMAN CENTER: $10k → 17%THE BOWMAN CENTER: $8k → 17%THEA BOWMAN CENTER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Cleveland Rotary Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Cleveland Rotary Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$118k · 5 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$118k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+79%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +39%
  • CN
    COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $27k · revenue +131%
  • FF
    FOOTPATH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -9%
  • BI
    BECAUSE I SAID I WOULDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +79%
  • HV
    HAITIAN VISION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cuyahoga Community College Foundation

The mission of the cuyahoga community college foundation is to provide resources for advancing student success at cuyahoga community college and to transform the lives of those tri-c serves. (continued on schedule o)

Education
2
America Scores Cleveland

America scores cleveland inspires urban youth to lead healthy lives, be engaged students, and have the confidence and character to make a difference in the world.

3
Open Doors Inc

Open doors academy (oda) provides year-round out-of-school time academic and enrichment programs to youth living in underserved communities. oda is based in cleveland, ohio and operates programs in northeast and northwest ohio. oda…

Youth Development
4
Grad Cincinnati Inc

Grad cincinnati raises expectation and achievement for all students by building high impact partnerships within the community to provide a premiere college readiness, access and support program.

Education
5
The City Club of Cleveland

The city club of cleveland's mission is to create conversations of consequence that help democracy thrive. we do this in pursuit of our vision of strong, informed individuals and communities that prize freedom of speech and civil, civic…

Education
6
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
7
Project Grad Akron

In collaboration with community partners, project grad akron will provide a system of programs, supports, and scholarships for underrepresented students to achieve success from pre-kindergarten through career.

Education
8
Cleveland Center for Arts and Technology

Mission: for all of our students to achieve optimal health by integrating mental and physical well-being and life purpose. values: we will improve the lives of our students and our community. we will fight inherently inequitable systems.…

Arts & Culture
9
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

10
Youth Enrichment Services Inc

Youth enrichment services, inc. was founded in 1994 for the purpose of providing at-risk teens and low-income families residing in allegheny county a comprehensive in-home peer mentoring program, juvenile alternative to detention,…

Human Services
11
Point Foundation

Point foundation supports the educational aspirations of lgbtq+ and ally students to become impactful leaders in their lives, careers, and communities.

Education
12
Ohio Invention League Inc

Ohio invention league has a mission to inspire curiosity, confidence and creative problem solving in our youth and advance invention and entrepreneurial education. we envision a day when every child, regardless of gender, race, religion,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Now Greater Cleveland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nanze Childrens Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC — $27,386 · EducationCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND …REACH SUCCESS INC — $11,060 · EducationREACH SUCCESS INCNanze Childrens Services Inc — $6,000 · EducationNanze Childrens Services IncCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOU…ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $36,030 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHIL…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630 — $6,250 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRIC…HAITIAN VISION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · OtherHAITIAN VISION FOUNDATION IN…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $25,050 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUN…THEA BOWMAN CENTER — $22,500 · Human ServicesTHEA BOWMAN C…FOOTPATH FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOOTPATH FOU…PEACEJAM FOUNDATION — $15,320 · Civil RightsPEACEJAM …BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD — $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$49,446Other$47,280International$25,050Human Services$22,500Youth Development$21,000Civil Rights$15,320Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $36,030 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC — $27,386 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $25,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEA BOWMAN CENTER — $22,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOOTPATH FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPEACEJAM FOUNDATION — $15,320 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREACH SUCCESS INC — $11,060 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630 — $6,250 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBECAUSE I SAID I WOULD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Char and Chuck Fowler Family FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cleveland Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph