Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cleveland Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Cleveland Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Henry County Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Cleveland Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
20
7
21
7
22
9
23
7
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$63kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$4kAnimals$3kEmployment$3kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$750
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC$1,200
PPGNHAIK (INDIANA CHAPTER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD)$1,000
THE DAMIEN CENTER$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$800
INDY HUMANE$750
WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES$750
THE JULIAN CENTER$600
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTHERN IN INC$500
CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL BACKBACK PROGRAM$500
BUCKNER'S PLACE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JULIEN CENTER: $600 → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $600 → 16%THE JULIEN CENTER: $600 → 16%THE JULIEN CENTER: $600 → 16%THE JULIEN CENTER: $600 → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $1k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $1k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $1k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $1k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $700 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $750 → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES: $750 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $600 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$35k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-8%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • TD
    THE DAMIEN CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +236%
  • WM
    WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IC
    INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $359 · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
2
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

3
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc

The indiana hemophilia and thrombosis center, inc. is committed to providing the highest quality comprehensive services and holistic care to patients with bleeding, clotting and other hematologic disorders, and to their families.

Health
5
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry County Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HENRY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $63,390 · PhilanthropyHENRY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $6,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF IN & KY — $3,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF …Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recip…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES FOUNDATION — $2,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES FO…INDIANA HEALTH FUND INC — $1,500 · OtherINDIANA HEALTH FUND IN…FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $1,000 · OtherPPGNHAIK (INDIANA CHAPTER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD) — $1,000 · Other+5 more — $2,439 · Other+5 moreTHE DAMIEN CENTER — $4,700 · Human ServicesTHE DAMIEN CE…WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $4,100 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSI…THE JULIAN CENTER INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE JULIAN CE…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,100 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $3,080 · Animals
Philanthropy$63,390Other$19,939Human Services$11,800Health$3,100Animals$3,080

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAMIEN CENTER — $4,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $4,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $3,080 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA HEALTH FUND INC — $1,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetINDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF INDIANA INC — $359 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds THE DAMIEN CENTER
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS
  • Who funds THE JULIAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds INDIANA HEALTH FUND INC
  • Who funds INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF INDIANA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cleveland Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph