Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clement and Karen Arrison Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$303kAnimals$232kArts & Culture$216kHealth$93kSocial Science$52kFood & Nutrition$36kHuman Services$25kScience & Tech$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$31,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$18,000
SUBURBAN ADULT SERVICES INC$16,150
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$15,000
PRESERVATION LEAGUE$12,000
BUFFALO SUZUKI STRINGS$10,000
CLRENCE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GLEN HIGHLAND FARMS$5,000
KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL$5,000
MUSICANS EMERGENCY FUND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
DRAFT GRATITUDE$3,000
GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE$2,000
BUFFALO HISTORY MUSEUM$1,575
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUBURBAN ADULT SERVICES INC: $16k → 13%LOTHIORIEN THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $16k → 13%LOTHIORIEN THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10k → 13%LOTHIORIEN THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5k → 13%LOTHIORIEN THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5k → 13%LOTHIORIEN THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
OH
NJ
CA
KY
MD
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 50 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
15

Total granted

$1.7M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

60%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $315k · revenue +59%
  • PL
    PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +9%
  • BS
    Buffalo Suzuki Strings Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • RICHARDSON CENTER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
4
Niagara Aquarium Foundation

With our community and partners, we celebrate our natural wonders and inspire people to make a difference for aquatic life.

Animals
5
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign

The american wild horse campaign is the nation's leading conservation organization dedicated to preserving the freedom and habitat of wild horses and burros. through its initiatives in advocacy, conservation, land preservation, and legal…

Animals
6
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
7
Buffalo Audubon Society Inc

Buffalo audubon society leads and inspires western new yorkers to connect with and protect the natural world through bird-focused activities, advocacy and habitat restoration.

Environment
8
Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences

Inspire joyful exploration of science and nature through engaging experiences, unique resources, and exceptional staff.

Arts & Culture
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
Spca of Westchester Inc

Mission: spca of westchester's mission is to lead in providing life changing care for animals through rescue and rehabilitation, justice, community education, and successful and lasting adoptions. vision: the promise of a future where our…

Animals
12
Arctic Fox Daily Wildlife Rescue Inc

To provide sanctuary to captive-bred unwanted, neglected, abandoned, or non-releasable wildlife, specializing in foxes and wolfdogs. we also practice wildlife rehabilitation which includes rescuing, raising, and releasing orphaned new…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoological Society of Buffalo Inc; the most unlike its peers is Last Chance Corral. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $312,323 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $177,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $159,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTEFOUNDATION: $52,000 · OtherROSEMARY FARM: $36,000 · Other+49 more: $282,994 · Other+49 moreCornell University: $315,052 · EducationCornell University+1 more: $6,200 · EducationPRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE: $91,500 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION L…Buffalo Suzuki Strings Inc: $90,000 · Arts & CultureBuffalo Suzuki…KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureKLEINHANS MUSI…CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCHAUTAUQUA INS…+4 more: $5,375 · Arts & CultureZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC: $50,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL…LAST CHANCE CORRAL: $38,000 · AnimalsLAST CHANC…DRAFT GRATITUDE: $29,100 · AnimalsDRAFT GRAT…HORSE RESCUE UNITED INC: $16,000 · AnimalsHORSE RESC…CHIMP HAVEN INC: $13,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVE…GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $11,000 · AnimalsGENTLE GIA…+5 more: $13,775 · Animals+5 moreLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $38,850 · Human ServicesSUBURBAN ADULT SERVICES INC: $16,150 · Human ServicesGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentBUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $3,000 · Environment
Other$1,020,177Education$321,252Arts & Culture$232,875Animals$170,875Human Services$55,000Youth Development$50,000Environment$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornell University: $315,052 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE: $91,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetBuffalo Suzuki Strings Inc: $90,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC: $50,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $38,850 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetLAST CHANCE CORRAL: $38,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetDRAFT GRATITUDE: $29,100 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetKLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC: $26,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUBURBAN ADULT SERVICES INC: $16,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSE RESCUE UNITED INC: $16,000 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE: $7,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR DEAF EDUCATION INC: $6,200 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARDSON CENTER CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRESERVATION BUFFALO NIAGARA: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHAWK CREEK WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO STRING WORKS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE POST INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPKD Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BUFFALO SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC: $375 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE ↗
  • Who funds Buffalo Suzuki Strings Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LAST CHANCE CORRAL ↗
  • Who funds DRAFT GRATITUDE ↗
  • Who funds KLEINHANS MUSIC HALL MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds SASI Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUBURBAN ADULT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSE RESCUE UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds WINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR DEAF EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds RICHARDSON CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Baird Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · The Frank G Raichle Foundation · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · Ferguson Electric Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · McLain Foundation · Simple Gifts Fund · Children's Foundation of Erie County Inc · Cullen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clement and Karen Arrison Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clement and Karen Arrison Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clement and Karen Arrison Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph