Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clear Channel Communications Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$180kYouth Development$83kHuman Services$76kArts & Culture$28kEducation$18kInternational$18kCivil Rights$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$32,000
BOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL$20,000
YMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO$15,000
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS$7,500
MULTICULTURAL MEDIA TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL$5,000
LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION$5,000
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $60k → 17%TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS: $8k → 10%ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO - CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 16%MULTICULTURAL MEDIA TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL: $5k → 14%EMMA'S WISH - KOVA FOUNDATIONLEE HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 10%ST LOUIS POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 21%LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%WORLD PEDIATRIC PROJECT: $5k → 22%LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $40k → 17%YMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%MULTICULTURAL MEDIA TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL: $5k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 21%LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%WORLD PEDIATRIC PROJECT: $3k → 22%BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $32k → 17%BOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $23k → 16%MULTICULTURAL MEDIA TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL: $5k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 11%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 21%LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $30k → 17%BOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $20k → 16%GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 11%BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $20k → 16%GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 11%BOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $20k → 16%YMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%YMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%YMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $10k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$401k · 9 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$401k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+38%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $172k · revenue +69%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $18k · revenue +65%
  • MM
    Multicultural Media Telecom & Internet Council
    3× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO - CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SL
    St Louis Police Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Broadcasters

National association of broadcasters (nab) advances the interest of radio and television broadcasters in federal government, industry and public affairs; improves the quality of broadcasting, and encourages technological innovation and…

—
2
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
3
Alabama Broadcasters Association

The alabama broadcasters association (the association) is the official voice of the broadcasting industry in alabama. we are dedicated to protecting and enhancing broadcasting, and promoting the professional status of our members.the aba…

—
4
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
8
Louisiana Association of Broadcasters
—
9
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
10
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
11
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broadcasters Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Good Shepherd Children & Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $172,000 · OtherBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICABOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $82,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - ALAMO AREA COUNCILYMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $60,000 · OtherYMCA GREATER SAN ANTONIOST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $18,000 · OtherLIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $13,000 · Other+4 more: $25,000 · Other+4 moreJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $17,500 · InternationalWORLD PEDIATRICS: $7,500 · InternationalMulticultural Media Telecom & Internet Council: $15,000 · Civil RightsSt Louis Police Foundation: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$385,500International$25,000Civil Rights$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $172,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMulticultural Media Telecom & Internet Council: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Multicultural Media Telecom & Internet Council ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY OF AMERICAN BROADCASTING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Louis Police Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clear Channel Communications Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clear Channel Communications Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clear Channel Communications Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clear Channel Communications Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clear Channel Communications’ filings →

    More from the funding graph