· Public charity
Clean Water Fund
CLEAN WATER FUND promotes clean, safe, and affordable water, empowering diverse groups of people to work together for changes that improve their lives, focused on health, environmental and community problems.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $291,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $347,999 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,999 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $276k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR | $45,000 |
| IRONBOUND COMMUNITY CORPORATION | $44,792 |
| NEW JERSEY ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE | $42,417 |
| CLINTON HILL COMMUNITY ACTION | $29,583 |
| FRIENDS OF ANACOSTIA PARK | $27,000 |
| RIDGE TO REEFS | $25,000 |
| CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CLINTON HILL COMMUNITY ACTION | $15,208 |
| SOUTH BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LAND TR | $12,000 |
| SALEM ALLIANCE FOR THE ENVIROMENT | $10,000 |
| MOUNTAINSIDE EDUCATION AND ENRICH | $8,000 |
| COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUC | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CLIMATE XCHANGE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC4× · 2017–2020 · $183k · revenue +131% · 25% of their budget- BFBETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC4× · 2017–2020 · $133k · revenue +20%
- ICIronbound Community Corporation5× · 2018–2023 · $100k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- CEChildren's Environmental Health Networkgraduated2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue +66%
- NWNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONgraduated2× · 2017–2018 · $33k · revenue +72%
- ELENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $32k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.
The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.
The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…
Legal assistance to nonprofit organizations working to solve environmental problems that threaten the people, natural resources and communities in the new jersey and tri-state region.
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anacostia Coordinating Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLIMATE XCHANGE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Ironbound Community Corporation ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds ANACOSTIA COORDINATING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HILL COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TOXICS ACTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL MASSACHUSETTS RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTH WARD ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Acadia Center ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Children's Environmental Health Network ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS INTERFAITH POWER AND LIGHT ↗
- Who funds RIDGE TO REEFS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Ward 8 Woods Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Washington Parks & People ↗
- Who funds FAIR SHAKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM ALLIANCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GREENROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds CARBON CYCLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ANACOSTIA WATERFRONT TRUST ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINSIDE EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Barr Foundation · Patagoniaorg · United States Energy Foundation · The New World Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The John Merck Fund · Cedar Tree Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Windward Fund · Greater Washington Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clean Water Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
- Ridge to Reefs Inc — 33% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc — 13% of income from government
- South Baltimore Community Land Trust Inc — 11% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of Waterbury Inc — 8% of income from government
- Howard Ecoworks Inc — 7% of income from government
- Clinton Hill Community Action Inc — 6% of income from government
- Salem Alliance for the Environment Inc — 5% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Clean Water Fund?
Find your warmest path to Clean Water Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.