· Public charity
Clark County Credit Union
Board approved mission: to help Clark County Credit Union members realize their financial goals and dreams.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $85,177 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $168,047 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,870 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Nevada Credit Union League Inc | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION | $12,500 |
| CANDLELIGHTERS FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER | $10,000 |
| National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors | $10,000 |
| THREE SQUARE | $7,500 |
| Board of Regents Nevada System of Higher Education | $7,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD CHALLENGE | $6,700 |
| Children's Miracle Network | $5,877 |
| Roseman University of Health Sciences | $5,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEVADA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +24%
- RUROSEMAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES5× · 2018–2024 · $39k · revenue +20%
- CMCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK3× · 2018–2024 · $20k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- RMRonald McDonald House Globalgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +82%
- CTCLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen, enhance, and protect business in Nevada.
Nevada cancer coalition works to reduce the burden of cancer in nevada by fostering statewide collaboration, empowering people with information and connections, and advocating for equitable access to care.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
To assist its members in fulfilling their respective missions of providing high quality, high value healthcare services to their communities. the association strives to be an effective advocate for improving the efficiency and…
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.
We advocate, we inform, and we connect
The nevada council on problem gambling is a non-profit information and referral agency whose efforts are focused on reducing the impact of problem gambling on individuals, families and communities in nevada. it is the mission of the nevada…
To provide leadership and support to members assisting them to advance both professional and community interests in long term care facilities.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEVADA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEMAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE CREDIT UNION SUPERVISORS ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHTERS FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds Las Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clark County Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Clean the World Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.