Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$2.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 57% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$93k43%
FY20245$140k20%
FY20231$150k0%
FY20225$142k0%
FY20217$126k29%
FY20207$103k57%
FY20193$18k67%
FY20172$8kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$378kFood & Nutrition$201kEnvironment$102kScience & Tech$79kEducation$19kRecreation & Sports$1k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($401k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc

How much does Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc give?
Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc reported 7 grants totaling $93,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (49%), Food & Nutrition (26%), Environment (13%).
Who are Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Roadrunner Food Bank Inc ($181k), Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ($120k), International OCD Foundation Inc ($50k).
Does Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc based?
Clarence & Almeda Conrad Foundation Inc is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clarence & Almeda Conrad’s filings →

More from the funding graph