Skip to content
City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$323kHealth$195kReligion$26kInternational$25kAnimals$13kEducation$10kCrime & Legal$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$2,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO$100,000
NEMA$50,000
SHINING STARS FOUNDATION$12,000
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC$10,000
BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
CITY UNION MISSION$5,000
POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$5,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
PRAEGER U$5,000
SHINING STARS FOUNDATION$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
LEGACY STONE$5,000
CASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $10k → 6%Health Network Foundation: $5k → 17%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $5k → 6%Challenge Aspen: $5k → 6%Safe House: $5k → 5%MOTHERS REFUGE: $250 → 15%SUSANNA SMILES: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 10 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$128k
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+9%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHINING STARS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue -13%
  • TG
    THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +51%
  • CA
    CHALLENGE ASPEN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +166%

Funded once

  • DA
    DAF At Provision Bridge
    one grant, 2022 · $104k
  • GO
    GLIMMER OF LIGHT FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
  • WW
    WAYSIDE WAIFS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Kansas Association of Community Action Programs Inc

Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.

Public Benefit
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Citizens Against Spouse Abuse Inc

The mission of citizens against spouse abuse, inc. is to empower domestic and sexual violence survivors to regain control of their lives through education, advocacy, and coordination of community resources.

—
5
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
6
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
11
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
12
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc; the most unlike its peers is Papillon Empowerment Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
16/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAF At Provision Bridge: $103,500 · OtherDAF At Provision BridgeYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $100,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIONEMA: $50,000 · OtherNEMAGLIMMER OF LIGHT FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $26,149 · OtherGLIMMER OF LIGHT FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES INCORPORATEDPRAEGER U: $15,000 · Other+43 more: $148,031 · Other+43 moreNEMA FOUNDATION INC: $310,000 · PhilanthropyNEMA FOUNDATION INCTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyCHALLENGE ASPEN: $20,000 · Human ServicesSUSANNA SMILES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $10,000 · AnimalsLake Lowell Animal Rescue Inc: $2,500 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsCASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsJACKSON COUNTY CASA: $5,000 · Civil RightsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthCARL'S CAUSE INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$442,680Philanthropy$330,500Human Services$35,250Recreation & Sports$22,000Animals$12,750Civil Rights$12,500Health$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEMA FOUNDATION INC: $310,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGE ASPEN: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY CASA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSANNA SMILES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCity Union Mission: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWHOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ARTISTS COALITION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOLD FORT MADISON PACSERVATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPETCO LOVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Refuge: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Greater HorizonsThe H & R Block Found…United Way of Greater…R a Long Foundation 6…Health Forward Founda…Oppenstein Brothers F…The Shumaker Family F…The Francis Family Fo…Jewish Community Foun…Hartley Family Founda…Vivian & Hymie J Sosl…
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · The H & R Block Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Health Forward Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Shumaker Family Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Hartley Family Foundation · Vivian & Hymie J Sosland Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to City Wide Facility Solutions Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on City Wide Facility Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home