Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cindy and Glenn Frey Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$50kEnvironment$40kFood & Nutrition$15kAnimals$10kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$5kHealth$5kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAIPA FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
HANALEI INITATIVE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KAUAI INDEPENDENT FOOD BANK$5,000
HANALEI WAINIHA HAENA COMMUNITY$5,000
INTER-NATION CULTURAL FOUNDATION$5,000
PARK CENTURY SCHOOL$5,000
KKCR$5,000
HUI MAKAAINANA O MAKANA$5,000
VETS AID$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FARMLINK PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 6 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$90k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
-33%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +93%
  • WF
    WAIPA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +35%
  • HM
    Hui Maka Ainana O Makana
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +200%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -33%
  • CS
    CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Na 'Aina Kai Botanical Gardens
Philanthropy
2
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
3
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
4
Ea Ecoversity

Ea ecoversity's mission is to provide culturally-driven learning, training, credentialing, and other long-term societal benefits to ka lahui hawai'i.

Education
5
Papahana Kuaola

Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…

Environment
6
Kahaluu Kuahewa

Our mission is to uplift the collective of aina (land), community, and culture, and preserve ancestral knowledge by reconnecting people to the land. we do this through indigenous grassroots initiatives, sustainable agriculture, and…

Environment
7
Hui Malama I Ke Ala Ulili

To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.

Community Improvement
8
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
9
Keiki O Ka 'Aina Preschool Inc

The mission of keiki o ka 'aina family learning centers (koka-flc) is to build strong communities by building strong families through communicating the vital importance of education, advocating for literacy, supporting parents as their…

Education
10
Holani Hana Inc

To reclaim Hawai'i as a beacon of Aloha for the world by activating our four pillars: (1)Pu'uhonua: Create a safe, welcoming, and culturally-rooted space at our site in Papaauhau where individuals, families, organizations, and groups can…

Recreation & Sports
11
Kaialahui Foundation

To empower hawaiis farming community to enhance food production and distribution through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Kohala Center

The kohala center is an independent community-based center for research, conservation, and education.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waipa Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Inter-Nation Cultural Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAIPA FOUNDATION: $15,220 · OtherWAIPA FOUNDATIONVETSAID: $15,000 · OtherVETSAIDKKCR: $15,000 · OtherKKCRHANALEI WAINIHA HAENA COMMUNITY: $5,000 · OtherHANALEI WAINIHA HAENA COMMUNITYCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 · OtherCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR THE ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $20,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GAR…Hui Maka Ainana O Makana: $15,000 · EnvironmentHui Maka Ainana O MakanaCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INCFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionThe Hanalei Initiative Inc: $7,500 · Community ImprovementPARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationINTER-NATION CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFARMLINK PROJECT: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$60,220Environment$40,000Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Community Improvement$7,500Education$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAIPA FOUNDATION: $15,220 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHui Maka Ainana O Makana: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Hanalei Initiative Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-NATION CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cindy and Glenn Frey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cindy and Glenn Frey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cindy and Glenn Frey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cindy and Glenn Frey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cindy and Glenn Frey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph