Skip to content

· Public charity

Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

$9.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$39MFood & Nutrition$2.9MArts & Culture$1.6MHuman Services$634kHealth$360kEducation$331kRecreation & Sports$240kScience & Tech$217kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $161k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $354k
  • $250k+3 grants · $9.2M
$110,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER$7,841,963
Individual grant recipient$893,143
REDI CINCINNATI$425,000
CINCINNATI COMPASS$243,994
CINCYTECH$110,000
THE GASKINS FOUNDATION$40,250
URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI$40,250
CINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$40,250
BRIGHTON CENTER INC$40,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $40k → 16%CINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $40k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 209 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

209 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 204 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

209
98

Total granted

$44M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-1%

Still filing today

0%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31M · revenue +39% · 28% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.4M
  • RC
    REDI CINCINNATI
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M

Funded once

  • RC
    REDI Cincinnati LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $533k
  • CC
    CINCINNATI Compass
    one grant, 2021 · $281k
  • DL
    DEAD LOW BREWING
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
2
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
3
The Contemporary Arts Center

The CAC is a lab for understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us through the experience and creation of all contemporary art forms.

Arts & Culture
4
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
5
Columbus Area Arts Council Inc

To enhance the quality of life in the community by stimulating community interest in art, fostering creation and inquiry throughout columbus, and leading a vibrant arts culture tied to our unique history.

Arts & Culture
6
Cincinnati Arts Association

The Cincinnati Arts Association (CAA), a not-for-profit, was founded in 1990 to serve as a manager, presenter and educator. CAA's mission is to present a broad range of high quality performing and visual arts programs, develop diverse…

Arts & Culture
7
Greater Cincinnati Convention and Visitors Bureau Inc

The cincinnati usa convention & visitors bureau is an aggressive sales, marketing, and service organization. our primary responsibility is to positively impact the region's area economy through convention, tradeshow and visitor…

—
8
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
9
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

—
10
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
12
The Dayton Art Institute

The dayton art institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association; the most unlike its peers is Gaskins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 311 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER: $30,850,929 · OtherCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBERIndividual grant recipient: $3,449,351 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+195 more: $9,867,570 · Other+195 moreCINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $40,250 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC: $40,250 · Human ServicesGASKINS FOUNDATION: $40,250 · Youth Development
Other$44,167,850Human Services$80,500Youth Development$40,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER: $30,850,929 over 8y, 28% of budgetBrighton Center Inc: $40,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $40,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC: $40,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
  • Who funds GASKINS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alloy Development Co IncOH93.4× affinity72 shared granteesties to 2 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alloy Development Co Inc · Urban League of Greater Southwestern Ohio Inc · Main Street Ventures · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 311 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph