Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cicero Kass L'Dor V'Dor Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$15kHuman Services$13kHealth$12kCrime & Legal$8kEducation$7kHousing & Shelter$6kYouth Development$4kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$450
Median grant
1
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL TBI$1,500
ISAIAH 61 CAFE$500
LAKES REGION BUILDERS & REMODELERS ASSOCIATION (LRBRA OF NH)GOLF TOURNAMENT$450
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NH- JFNH$250
LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$118
UNION CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EASTER SEALS: $1k → 7%EASTER SEALS: $100 → 7%ISAIAH 61 CAFE: $500 → 9%Belnap House: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 21 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
27

Total granted

$52k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+64%

Still filing today

29%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +46%
  • TD
    THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +22%
  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • KJ
    KIMBERLY JAMESON HOMELESS FUNDRAISER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • GL
    Greater Lakes Region Childrens Auct
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • TB
    Temple Beth Israel
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakes Region Search and Rescue Inc
Public Safety & Disaster
2
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
3
Lakes Region Consumer Advisory Board

LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.

Health
4
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
5
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
7
Northern Berkshire Youth Hockey League Inc
—
8
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
9
Lowell Area Housing Inc Dba Schneider Manor
—
10
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Homestead Inc
—
12
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Union Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN AT RISK ADVOCACY FDN: $17,500 · OtherCHILDREN AT RISK ADVOCACY FDNKIMBERLY JAMESON HOMELESS FUNDRAISER: $5,000 · OtherKIMBERLY JAMESON HOMELESS FUNDRAISERTemple Beth Jacob: $4,086 · OtherTemple Beth JacobGreater Lakes Region Childrens Auct: $4,000 · OtherGreater Lakes Region Childrens AuctTemple BNai Israel: $3,415 · OtherTemple BNai IsraelTHE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL: $3,080 · OtherTHE DERRYFIELD SCHOOLTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL TBI: $3,000 · Other+33 more: $16,920 · Other+33 moreTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,668 · HealthTHE LAKES REGION …+1 more: $100 · HealthEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $1,100 · Human ServicesIsaiah 61 Cafe: $500 · Human ServicesBelknap House: $200 · Human ServicesGOT LUNCH LACONIA: $1,110 · Food & NutritionJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $180 · EducationLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyTROY AREA YOUTH SOCCER: $70 · Recreation & Sports
Other$57,001Health$10,768Human Services$1,800Food & Nutrition$1,110Education$180Philanthropy$100Recreation & Sports$70

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,668 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL: $3,080 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIsaiah 61 Cafe: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBelknap House: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVIGATING RECOVERY OF THE LAKES REGION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTROY AREA YOUTH SOCCER: $70 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GOT LUNCH LACONIA ↗
  • Who funds Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc ↗
  • Who funds Isaiah 61 Cafe ↗
  • Who funds UNION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Belknap House ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cicero Kass L'Dor V'Dor Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cicero Kass L'Dor V'Dor Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cicero Kass L'Dor V'Dor’s filings →

More from the funding graph