Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chuza Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$389kHuman Services$187kFood & Nutrition$132kHousing & Shelter$70kInternational$69kPhilanthropy$18kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $152k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$210k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOROTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$151,500
WORLD VISION$25,360
CT FOOD BANK$25,000
KIDS IN CRISIS INC$25,000
EL CENTRO HISPANO INC$20,000
CHRISTIAN MISSION GARZA$15,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ALUMNI$5,000
DARIEN COMMUNITY FUND$2,500
PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$1,000
AFLIK$1,000
AMHERST ALUMNI FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$500
DARIEN LIBRARY$300
WSHU (SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY)$300
NOROTON HEIGHTS FIRE DEPT$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN MISSION TO GAZA: $10k → 14%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $25k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $25k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $20k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $6k → 9%CHRISTIAN MISSION GARZA: $15k → 9%CHRISTIAN MISSION TO GAZA: $5k → 9%CHRISTIAN MISSION GARZA: $5k → 9%AT HOME IN DARIEN: $300 → 9%FAMILY & CHILDRENS AGENCY: $300 → 9%AT HOME IN DARIEN: $100 → 9%AT HOME IN DARIEN: $100 → 9%AT HOME IN DARIEN: $100 → 9%AT HOME IN DARIEN: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$876k · 30 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
18

Total granted

$876k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KI
    KIDS IN CRISIS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +67%
  • CF
    CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +64%
  • II
    INSPIRICA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PT
    PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -13%
  • P
    PTS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
2
The Darien Foundation Inc

The darien foundation's mission is to provide grant funding for technology and capital projects that create opportunity for darien's youth, support town safety and security services, enhance the overall quality of life in darien, and…

Education
3
Land Trust of Darien Inc

Open space preservation in darien, connecticut

Environment
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
5
Darien Study Center Inc

In cooperation with the Roman Catholic Prelature of Opus Dei, Darien Study Center fosters the search for holiness in the middle of the world, by means of ordinary work and all the other circumstances of daily life. See www.opusdei.org.

Education
6
Family and Children's Aid Inc

Fca is a community-based behavioral health center that offers innovation, responsive and traditional mental health care and services for children, adolescents, adults and their families.

Human Services
7
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
8
Darien Emergency Medical Service Inc

to provide ambulance services

Health
9
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
10
Damian Family Care Centers Inc

Damian is a system of 14 federally qualified health centers with a mission to provide quality, comprehensive health care to medically underserved individuals, regardless of their ability to pay. our core services are designed to improve…

Health
11
Darien Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department whose purpose is to fight fires and promote fire safety.

—
12
Daemen University

Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Darien Community Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Mission to Gaza. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOROTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $379,800 · OtherNOROTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $110,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INCCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $100,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCINSPIRICA INC: $70,000 · OtherINSPIRICA INCWORLD VISION: $28,876 · Other+33 more: $50,100 · Other+33 moreEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO HISP…CHRISTIAN MISSION TO GAZA: $35,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN MISS…+2 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $31,000 · Food & NutritionSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalDARIEN LIBRARY INC: $1,900 · EducationFriends of Forman Christian College Inc: $1,000 · EducationDarien Community Association Inc: $2,150 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF AMBLER FARM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDARIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$738,776Human Services$112,000Food & Nutrition$31,000International$5,000Education$2,900Community Improvement$2,150Arts & Culture$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $76,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetINSPIRICA INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN MISSION TO GAZA: $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDarien Community Association Inc: $2,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDARIEN LIBRARY INC: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE IN DARIEN INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Forman Christian College Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMBLER FARM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated: $700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAT HOME IN DARIENINC: $700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHORIZONS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDARIEN POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQ PLACE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDARIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN MISSION TO GAZA ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Darien Community Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds DARIEN LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER CHANCE IN DARIEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Forman Christian College Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AMBLER FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME IN DARIENINC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DARIEN POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goodnow FundCT17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goodnow Fund · Schaefer-Phillips Foundation Inc · 522 Foundation Inc · The Meredith and Whitney George Family Foundation Inc · Mbia Foundation · The Darien Foundation Inc · The Stuart L Higley Foundation Inc · Pieter and Yvette Eenkema Van Dijk Foundation · The Rogers Family Foundation · The Roxe Foundation · The Edward E Hood Jr Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chuza Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chuza Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Horizons Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Friends of Ambler Farm Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chuza’s filings →

More from the funding graph