· Private foundation
Chub and Mary D Munger Foundation
Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD SHARE | $2,500 |
| CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BUTTE CENTRAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| CARROLL COLLEGE FOUNDATION -NURSING DEPT | $2,000 |
| MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING | $2,000 |
| HELENA AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,500 |
| THE ANGEL FUND | $1,500 |
| ST JAMES SCHOOL OF NURSING | $1,500 |
| WIDOWS MIGHT | $1,000 |
| KAY MCKENNAS YOUTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP CENTER | $1,000 |
| WESTMONT -THE CALDWELL HOUSE | $1,000 |
| CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION CAMP MAKE A DREAM | $1,000 |
| GOD'S LOVE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of iowa brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope by partnering with local habitat for humanity organizations to offer financial products, resource development,…
Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.
To provide non-denominational christian education opportunities in fort collins and the northern colorado region.
Inspiring life journeys
Mental health america of the heartland improves the mental health of the community and the quality of life of persons with mental illness through information, education and support.
Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…
Strengthening minnesota's supportive housing community to advance long-term solutions to homelessness.
Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.
To support and encourage those whose lives have been impacted by cancer.
To offer financial assistance to Northern Minnesota residents facing cancer for expenses not covered by medical insurance.
Heart Havens empowers adults with a developmental disability to live and thrive in their communities.
The region iii mental health center is a registered non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to the establishment, development and maintenance of high quality mental health and chemical dependency care in south central montana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendship Center of Helena Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gods Love Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of the Lewis and Clark Area Inc · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Wall Family-Power Townsend Foundation · Treacy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chub and Mary D Munger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.