Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2023
25
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$45k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Gilroy Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $138k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’20
10
’21
9
’22
12
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$423kEducation$96kArts & Culture$53kFood & Nutrition$48kHealth$48kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k21 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
$1,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$45,000
STJOSEPH'S FAMILY CENTER$20,260
GILROY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,895
REBEKAH CHILDREN'S SERVICES$14,300
SOUTH VALLEY CIVIC THEATRE$8,582
MUSSON THEATRICAL$6,686
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GILROY FOUNDATION - LATINO FAMILY FUND$3,500
HABING FAMILY FUNERAL HOME$2,819
INDEPENDENCE DAY CELEBRATION INC$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$2,000
MORGAN HILL PONY BASEBALL$1,750
ST MARY'S CEMETERY$1,032
GILROY HIGH SCHOOL QUARTERBACK CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONE GIVING TREE: $500 → 8%EL ROBLE HOME AND SCHOOL CLUB: $250 → 8%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MI
NY
IN
PA
CA
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 12 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$200k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+8%

Still filing today

58%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    South Valley Civic Theatre
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +233%
  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +6%
  • OF
    ODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • GG
    GILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue ×17 · 32% of their budget
  • FT
    FEED THE FRONTLINES NYC INC
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue -94%
  • JE
    JG EYES UP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gilroy Historical Society

The purpose of the gilroy historical society is to bring together people interested in the history of gilroy and the surrounding area. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life. it provides a view of…

—
2
Gilroy Rodeo Association

The Gilroy Rodeo Association (GRA) is organized exclusively for the purpose of educating the public and informing the youth of Santa Clara County and surrounding areas in the art and history of the cowboy and cowgirl rodeo and about…

Recreation & Sports
3
Silicon Valley Community Sports Association

We believe that sports have the power to unite individuals from diverse backgrounds, promote physical fitness and well-being, and cultivate a spirit of camaraderie and sportsmanship.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of South San Luis Obispo County

To operate a boys and girls club facility and after-school and summer camp programs for all area children regardless of ability to pay in the Five Cities area of San Luis Obispo County.

Youth Development
5
Saint Louise Regional Hospital Howard B Grobstein Liquidating Trustee

Saint loiuse regional hospital was a 93-bed acute care hosptial which offered a wide range of services to residents of santa clara and san benito counties.

—
6
Gilroy Police Foundation Inc

To provide community programs which support law enforcement and crime prevention needs of the community of gilroy. to provide training and equipment for the police department of the city of gilroy, a california municipal corporation.

Crime & Legal
7
Santa Clarita Valley Boys and Girls Club

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
8
Santa Clara Youth Rugby

Silicon Valley Rugby Football Club SVRFC is rugby program based in San Jose California and the surrounding areas. SVRFC's stated mission is encourage and grow the sport of rugby in the Silicon Valley and surrounding areas. SVRFC was…

Recreation & Sports
9
Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley

The club's mission is to enable all young people, specially those who need it most, to reach their potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
10
Gay Pride Celebration Committee of San Jose

Organize plan and market silicon valley pride parade and associated events activities.

—
11
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Gilroy Downtown Business Association

promote and support downtown business

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gilroy Assistance League; the most unlike its peers is Little League Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILROY FOUNDATION: $400,000 · OtherGILROY FOUNDATIONCHRISTOPHER HIGH SCHOOL: $54,300 · OtherCHRISTOPHER HIGH SCHOOLODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA: $33,031 · OtherODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIAGAVILAN COLLEGE: $22,500 · Other+37 more: $74,569 · Other+37 moreVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $45,000 · HealthSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER: $33,520 · Food & NutritionFEED THE FRONTLINES NYC INC: $9,000 · Food & NutritionSouth Valley Civic Theatre: $35,046 · Arts & CultureIndependence Day Celebration Inc: $4,550 · Arts & CultureGILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $19,700 · PhilanthropyGILROY ASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLEADERSHIP GILROY: $2,050 · EducationTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Civil Rights
Other$584,400Health$45,000Food & Nutrition$42,520Arts & Culture$39,596Philanthropy$21,700Education$2,050Civil Rights$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGILROY FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Valley Civic Theatre: $35,046 over 3y, 13% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER: $33,520 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA: $33,031 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $19,700 over 1y, 32% of budgetFEED THE FRONTLINES NYC INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndependence Day Celebration Inc: $4,550 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLEADERSHIP GILROY: $2,050 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILROY HIGH SCHOOL QUARTERBACK CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS: $600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRotary Club of Gilroy: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dreampower Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL ROBLE HOME AND SCHOOL CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSouth County Tail Waggers: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GILROY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
  • Who funds South Valley Civic Theatre ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds GILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE FRONTLINES NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Independence Day Celebration Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP GILROY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS ↗
  • Who funds GILROY ASSISTANCE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN HILL PONY BASEBALL ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GILROY HIGH SCHOOL QUARTERBACK CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gilroy FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gilroy Foundation · The Rendiamo Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Christopher Ranch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christopher Ranch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph