Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$93kHealth$63kInternational$53kFood & Nutrition$28kAnimals$25kEducation$15kReligion$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$371k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARLOS BASEBALL ACADEMY$10,000
WOODSTOCK HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
WOODSTOCK FOOD PANTRY$10,000
LOVE 4 SANTOS$10,000
VETERANS PATH TO HOPE$10,000
HOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS$10,000
BLUE WATER SURRENDER$10,000
HELPING PAWS$5,000
OPERATION WILD HORSE$5,000
MAINSTAY THERAPEUTIC FARM$5,000
WARP CORPS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BLUE WATER SURRENDER: $20k → 13%BLUE WATER SURRENDER: $20k → 13%TURNING POINT: $15k → 6%BLUE WATER SURRENDER: $10k → 13%BLUE WATER SURRENDER: $3k → 13%WARP CORPS: $12k → 6%WARP CORPS: $5k → 6%WARP CORPS: $1k → 6%MAINSTAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfplessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 4 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$139k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BLUE WATER SURRENDER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue -13%
  • HM
    HOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +96%
  • WF
    Woodstock Food Pantry
    4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +690%

Funded once

  • PC
    PIONEER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • M
    MAINSTAY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • TP
    Turning Point Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Sound Wildlife Shelter

Rehabilitation of sick, injured or abandoned wildlife and releasing back into the wild.

Animals
2
A Turning Point Ministry Inc

We are A Turning Point. We honor dignity, restore worth and help people navigate sustainable pathways to reimagine their potential.

Public Benefit
3
Horses for Healing Inc

The mission of Horses for Healing Inc is the provision of client-centered, trauma-informed, and evidence-based clinical equine psychotherapy and comlementary services that support healing from pervasive trauma.

Health
4
Therapeutic Living Services Inc

To provide housing and independent living programs to those recovering from mental illness.

Human Services
5
Transition House Inc

Provide transitional living and community outreach for adults recovering from mental illness

Health
6
Open Arms Housing Inc

Open Arms Housings (OAH) mission is to provide permanent homes and ongoing support to women experiencing homelessness. Special care is taken to provide comprehensive mental health support to OAH clients.

Human Services
7
Fox Valley Farms Inc

Preventing & Reducing Homelessness among People and Pets

Housing & Shelter
8
Red Door Animal Shelter

Our mission is to promote respect for all animals through education, rescue, sheltering and adoption.

Animals
9
Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc

The mission of the Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard is to provide shelter, health care, lover and support to all domestic animals until a permanent home is found for them.

Animals
10
Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc

Operation of Animal Shelter

Animals
11
The Turning Point Home of San Diego

Our mission is to help alcoholic women achieve long-term sobriety in a safe, supportive, structured, alcohol and drug-free environment, through guidance and education.

Health
12
Transformation House

To provide free transitional housing to women, mothers and children who are survivors of domestic violence and help them work towards self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Main Stay Therapeutic Farm Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blue Water Surrender. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIONEER CENTER: $38,000 · OtherPIONEER CENTERWoodstock Food Pantry: $28,000 · OtherWoodstock Food PantryMAINSTAY: $15,000 · OtherMAINSTAYST PETER CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST PETER CHURCHCARLOS BASEBALL ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherCARLOS BASEBALL ACADEMYCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE FUND: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE FUNDWOODSTOCK HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherWOODSTOCK HIGH SCHOOLLOVE 4 SANTOS: $10,000 · OtherLOVE 4 SANTOSFOR THE LOVE OF SATOS: $5,000 · OtherHELPING PAWS: $5,000 · OtherOPERATION WILD HORSE: $5,000 · OtherBLUE WATER SURRENDER: $53,000 · Human ServicesBLUE WATER SURRENDERHOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesHOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS INCWARP CORPS: $18,000 · Human ServicesWARP CORPSTurning Point Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesTurning Point IncMAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTransitional Living Services Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · AnimalsLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$146,000Human Services$131,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Animals$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE WATER SURRENDER: $53,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWoodstock Food Pantry: $28,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetWARP CORPS: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE WATER SURRENDER ↗
  • Who funds HOGAR MIS PRIMEROS PASOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Woodstock Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds WARP CORPS ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for McHenry CountyIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for McHenry County · AbbVie Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp?

    Find your warmest path to Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chmiel Charitable Fund Nfp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph