Skip to content

· Public charity

Childrens Charities at Adios

Fund raising for childrens charities

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$388kArts & Culture$123kEducation$105kHuman Services$83kPhilanthropy$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $83k
$8,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$22,500
CITY LIGHTS$14,500
ST LOUIS CTR FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDR$14,000
JT MESTDAGH FOUNDATION$10,700
CONDUCTIVE LEARNING CENTER OF NORTH$10,400
WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,400
PENRICKTON CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDRE$8,600
KIDS ON THE GO$6,400
CONDUCTIVE CENTER OF METRO DETROIT$6,000
THE ARC GROSSE POINTE HARPER WOODS$5,800
EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPIES OF FL$5,800
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $4k → 8%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $3k → 8%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $3k → 8%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $3k → 8%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $6k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $6k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $6k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $6k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $5k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $5k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $5k → 21%KIDS ON THE GO: $4k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$827k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$827k
$8k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +146%
  • VH
    VISION HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +175%
  • PC
    Penrickton Center for Blind Children
    8× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NINO SALVAGGIO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • UL
    UNIVERSITY LIGGETT
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chaps Center Inc

Help disabled children

Health
2
Arc of West Central Colorado

The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…

Human Services
3
Child Development Center Inc

The Child Development Center is a developmental day center designed to build the independence of exceptional children through high-quality early education and therapeutic services. It serves special needs children ages 2 to 5 from New…

Education
4
The Childrens Center for Neurodevelopmental Studies Inc

To assist the development of autistic and other neurodevelopmentally delayed children toward a happy and productive future where their maximum potential can be realized.

—
5
Freedom Riding

Freedom Riding's mission is to support the treatment and healing of children who could benefit from any a variety of sensory-based engagements, often associated with a variety of conditions: such as attention deficit hyperactivity…

Recreation & Sports
6
The Friendship Circle Inc

The friendship circle is a unique organization with a refreshing approach to helping families of children with special needs.

Human Services
7
Gait Therapeutic Riding Center

To improve the quality of life of children and adults with special needs through equine activites and therapies resulting in a more independent life in society.

Education
8
Friendship Circle of Connecticut Inc

Programs for children with special needs.

Education
9
Cincinnati Therapeutic Riding and Horsem Horsemanship

Provide equine-assisted services to children and adults with disabilities in the greater cincinnati area including a comprehensive recreational and threapeutic horseback riding program.

—
10
Wildstar Equine Assisted Activities and Therapy in

Therapeutic riding, horsemanship lessons

Health
11
Dreams Go On Inc

Provide recreational activities (namely horseback riding) for disabled children.

Health
12
Florence County Disabilities & Special Needs Board

To be the premier provider in promoting and supporting self-determination, personal growth and inclusion for people to achieve their desired outcomes.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Christ Child Society of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is The Arc Grosse Pointe Harper Woods. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS CTR FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDR: $102,000 · OtherST LOUIS CTR FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDRCITY LIGHTS: $86,500 · OtherCITY LIGHTSEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPIES OF FLORID: $57,000 · OtherEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPIES OF FLORIDCONDUCTIVE LEARNING CENTER OF NORTH: $55,100 · OtherCONDUCTIVE LEARNING CENTER OF NORTHCONDUCTIVE CENTER OF METRO DETROIT: $44,100 · OtherCONDUCTIVE CENTER OF METRO DETROITTHE ARC GROSSE POINTE HARPER WOODS: $38,200 · OtherTHE ARC GROSSE POINTE HARPER WOODSIndividual grant recipient: $37,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NINO SALVAGGIO FOUNDATION FOR C: $30,600 · OtherTHE NINO SALVAGGIO FOUNDATION FOR CTherapeutic Riding Inc: $18,000 · Other+7 more: $52,700 · Other+7 moreWILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $80,300 · PhilanthropyWILDCAT RUN C…THE JT MESTDAGH FOUNDATION: $20,700 · PhilanthropyTHE JT MESTDA…KIDS ON THE GO: $41,300 · Human ServicesKIDS ON TH…FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesFULL CIRCL…THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $11,700 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST…VISION HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $70,800 · Housing & ShelterVISION HO…Penrickton Center for Blind Children: $66,600 · HealthPenrickto…
Other$521,800Philanthropy$101,000Human Services$75,000Housing & Shelter$70,800Health$66,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $80,300 over 8y, 14% of budgetVISION HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $70,800 over 6y, 20% of budgetPenrickton Center for Blind Children: $66,600 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetKIDS ON THE GO: $41,300 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetTHE ARC GROSSE POINTE HARPER WOODS: $38,200 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetFULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE JT MESTDAGH FOUNDATION: $20,700 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTherapeutic Riding Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $11,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Penrickton Center for Blind Children ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON THE GO ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC GROSSE POINTE HARPER WOODS ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JT MESTDAGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Detroit Industrial School · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Childrens Charities at Adios funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Childrens Charities at Adios. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Childrens Charities at Adios?

    Find your warmest path to Childrens Charities at Adios through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Childrens Charities at Adios’ filings →

    More from the funding graph