Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Child Aid USA Inc

We work with other not-for-profit organizations to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives.

$133k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $93,053 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $132,525 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,472 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k7 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$7,914
Median grant
8
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT$18,324
ECPAT-USA END CHILD PROSTITUTION CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND TRAFFICKING OF CHI$15,637
A LITTLE HOPE$11,149
GREAT KIDS$9,466
BLACK ADMINISTRATORS IN CHILD WELFARE$7,914
HEDGE FUNDS CARE$6,967
UNITED NATIONAL INDIAN TRIBAL YOUTH$6,465
CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE$5,797
CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES$5,771
HESHIMA KENYA$5,563
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES: $6k → 13%BLACK ADMINISTRATORS IN CHILD WELFARE: $8k → 8%GREAT KIDS: $9k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
CO
NE
KY
MD
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
2
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

3
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
4
For the Child Inc

The organization provides child abuse and mental health counseling, prevention services, and parent education/support groups.

Crime & Legal
5
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
6
Kinship Incorporated

Prevention of child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal
7
Whole Child International

Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.

Youth Development
8
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
11
Children's Advocacy Center Nepa

The children's advocacy center of northeastern pennsylvania is a private, non-profit, charitable organization whose mission is to provide excellence in the assessment and treatment of child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal
12
Global Alliance for Children

Promoting and supporting the development of national and community level systems that help children realize their full potential within a nurturing, protective family care environment.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Little Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREAT KIDS INC — $9,466 · Human ServicesGREAT KIDS INCBLACK ADMINISTRATORS IN CHILD WELFARE INC — $7,914 · Human ServicesBLACK ADMINISTRATORS IN CHIL…CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC — $5,771 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES IN…ECPAT-USA INC — $15,637 · InternationalECPAT-USA INCRefuSHE Inc — $5,563 · InternationalRefuSHE IncINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT — $18,324 · Crime & LegalINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY …A LITTLE HOPE INC — $11,149 · Public Safety & DisasterA LITTLE HOPE…HEDGE FUNDS CARE INC — $6,967 · PhilanthropyUNITED NATIONAL INDIAN TRIBAL YOUTH INC — $6,465 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $5,797 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$23,151International$21,200Crime & Legal$18,324Public Safety & Disaster$11,149Philanthropy$6,967Youth Development$6,465Recreation & Sports$5,797

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT — $18,324 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetECPAT-USA INC — $15,637 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetA LITTLE HOPE INC — $11,149 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGREAT KIDS INC — $9,466 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEDGE FUNDS CARE INC — $6,967 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NATIONAL INDIAN TRIBAL YOUTH INC — $6,465 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $5,797 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC — $5,771 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Child Aid USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Child Aid USA Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Child Aid USA Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph