Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chilcote Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.1MArts & Culture$275kCommunity Improvement$161kEducation$21kHealth$15kCivil Rights$5kReligion$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
$215,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$652k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTFUL OHIO INC$215,000
ROFANT CLUB$2,275
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONSERVANCY FOR CVNP: $25k → 13%ARTFUL OHIO INC: $215k → 16%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $3k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $3k → 10%CONSERVANCY FOR CUY VALLEY NP: $3k → 13%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $4k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $4k → 17%US MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $3k → 9%EPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $3k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%LITERARY CLEVELAND: $8k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $1k → 17%FUTURE HEIGHTS INC: $15k → 17%FUTURE HEIGHTS INC: $15k → 17%URBAN OAK SCHOOL: $10k → 17%FAIRMONT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 17%COVENTRY PEACE: $1k → 17%ARTFUL OHIO: $1k → 17%REACHING HEIGHTS: $1k → 17%BUILDING BRIDGES ART COLLABORATIVE: $8k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $4k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $4k → 17%LAND STUDIO INC: $3k → 17%COVENTRY ENHANCING CHILDS ENVRNMT: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $500k → 17%FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE: $61k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $230k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET: $30k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $210k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $65k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $50k → 17%MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO: $10k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE: $1k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $13k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $13k → 17%UNIVERSITY CIRCLE: $3k → 17%ROFANT CLUB: $2k → 17%INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY CIRCLE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+162%

Still filing today

58%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +44%
  • AO
    ARTFUL OHIO INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $216k · revenue +971% · 32% of their budget
  • FI
    FutureHeights Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • FF
    FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +263%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • UO
    URBAN OAK SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Land Cle

The Land is a local news startup that reports on Clevelands neighborhoods and inner ring suburbs. We deliver in-depth stories that foster accountability, inform the community, and inspire people to take action.

Arts & Culture
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
4
Midtown Cleveland Inc

Midtown cleveland, inc. leverages its diverse assets to create a dynamic neighborhood that unites cleveland's downtown and innovation districts.

Community Improvement
5
The Cleveland Institute of Art

The mission statement of the cleveland institute of art is as follows: to cultivate creative leaders who inspire people, strengthen communities, and contribute to a thriving and sustainable economy through an innovative education in art…

Education
6
Engage Cleveland Inc

Our mission is to attract, engage and retain emerging diverse talent to Greater Cleveland.

Community Improvement
7
Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra Inc

The Northern Ohio Youth Orchestra provides exceptional musical education through a variety of performance opportunities for young musicians of all backgrounds in an inclusive community of learning and growth.

—
8
Greater Cleveland Media Development Corporation

To promote the increase of media production in Northeast Ohio using effective strategies for attraction and workforce development including building an artistic infrastructure through film, achieve increased economic development in…

Philanthropy
9
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
10
Cleveland Development Foundation

Developing and improving Cleveland Ohio's civic visions.

Community Improvement
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Citymusic Cleveland Inc

Citymusic cleveland is a professional chamber orchestra, which performs free concerts throughout n.e. ohio, accompanied by art shows of local artists. our mission is to develop audiences & build communities through the arts by presenting…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Land Studio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Reserve Chorale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $1,058,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL+3 more: $11,000 · EducationARTFUL OHIO INC: $216,000 · Arts & CultureARTFUL OHIO INCFutureHeights Inc: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFutureHeights Inc+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NET: $50,000 · OtherMANUFACTURING…INLET DANCE THEATRE CO MUSIC SETTL: $26,500 · OtherINLET DANCE T…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual gr…MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY GROWTH NETWO: $20,000 · OtherMANUFACTURING…LAND STUDIO INC: $11,000 · OtherLAND STUDIO I…URBAN OAK SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherEPILIPSY ASSOCIATION OF NE OHIO: $9,500 · OtherUS MARINE CORP SCHOLARSHIP FNDT: $7,500 · OtherBUILDING BRIDGES ART COLLABORATIVE: $7,500 · Other+6 more: $21,025 · Other+6 moreFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $60,500 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $3,500 · Community Improvement
Education$1,069,000Arts & Culture$249,000Other$188,025Community Improvement$64,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $1,058,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetARTFUL OHIO INC: $216,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $60,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFutureHeights Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetLAND STUDIO INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING HEIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ARTFUL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FutureHeights Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAND STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Literary Cleveland ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds REACHING HEIGHTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Gund FoundationOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · George Codrington Fdnhirtlena · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chilcote Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chilcote Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chilcote Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chilcote Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chilcote Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph