Skip to content
Chi St Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Chi St Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

$684k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$30MHuman Services$5.5MHousing & Shelter$183kReligion$50kCommunity Improvement$40kRecreation & Sports$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $634,372, the rows itemized in this filing. The $684,432 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,060 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $589k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROSE$100,000
HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER INC$100,000
NETWORK OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS$100,000
SAN JOSE CLINIC$100,000
MAGNIFICAT HOUSES INC$95,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON$94,372
THE LIGHTHOUSE OF HOUSTON$25,000
THE ARC OF HARRIS COUNTY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $94k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $100k → 16%NETWORK OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

3%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 6 repeat orgs$35M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
26

Total granted

$1.2M
$34M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    SAN JOSE CLINIC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $550k
  • TR
    THE ROSE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue -1%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $194k · revenue -7%

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicinegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15M · revenue +67%
  • HC
    HARRIS COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $11M
  • SO
    Service Organization of Houston
    one grant, 2017 · $5.2M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Texas Heart Medical Group

To provide cutting-edge cardiac care to diagnose, treat, and prevent cardiovascular diseases.

Health
3
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
4
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
5
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
6
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
9
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Hospitality Apartments

The Hospitality Apartments provide no-cost lodgingexcept for cleaning fee to out of town patients living greater than 50 miles from Houston receiving care from any of the hospitals in the Houston Medical Center.

—
12
Tmh Physician Organization

This organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Choice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Houston International Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Baylor College of Medicine: $14,578,277 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine+2 more: $80,000 · EducationHARRIS COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $10,805,871 · HealthHARRIS COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INCST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,984,824 · HealthST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER+4 more: $223,579 · HealthService Organization of Houston: $5,169,804 · OtherService Organization of …SERVICE ORGANIZATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $1,337,431 · OtherSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF …SAN JOSE CLINIC: $550,409 · OtherSAN JOSE CLINIC+18 more: $620,093 · Other+18 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $194,372 · Human ServicesHouston Area Women's Center: $100,000 · Human ServicesThe Network of Behavioral Health Providers Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesHOUSTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyIndoAmerican Chamber of Commerce Greater Houston: $30,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSTON INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Education$14,658,277Health$13,014,274Other$7,677,737Human Services$394,372Philanthropy$100,000Community Improvement$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $14,578,277 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,984,824 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $1,337,431 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE ROSE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $194,372 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMagnificat Houses Inc: $183,150 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetThe Network of Behavioral Health Providers Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetHOUSTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLighthouse For The Blind Of Houston Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Choice Inc: $9,714 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNora's Gift Foundation Inc: $5,329 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…Greater Houston Commu…The Medallion Foundat…The Methodist HospitalBaxter Trust Co Priva…United Way of Greater…Houston Endowment IncEnterprise Holdings F…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…
Shell USA Company FoundationTX15.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Medallion Foundation Inc · The Methodist Hospital · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · United Way of Greater Houston · Houston Endowment Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chi St Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chi St Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chi St Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home