Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$479k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MInternational$479kFood & Nutrition$52kPhilanthropy$26kCivil Rights$21kHealth$14kHuman Services$12kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$279,675
FRIENDS OF U OF SURREY USA$99,684
BAN KIMOON FOUNDATION USA$49,030
PHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN$20,050
625 FOUNDATION$20,000
ASIAN AMERICAN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION O$5,000
CHAPIN SCHOOL$1,931
LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO$818
PRINCETON CLUB OF SW FLORIDA$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
MD
DE
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 11 repeat orgs$672k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
32

Total granted

$2.7M
$664k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+6%

Still filing today

55%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF U OF SURREY USA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $296k
  • BK
    BAN KIMOON FOUNDATION USA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $246k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $414k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE BAN KI-MOON
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • AF
    ASPEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
11
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of the Lawrenceville School; the most unlike its peers is 625 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University: $1,894,267 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,250 · Education+4 more: $70,731 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $413,747 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF U OF SURREY USA: $296,099 · OtherFRIENDS OF U OF SURREY USABAN KIMOON FOUNDATION USA: $245,931 · OtherBAN KIMOON FOUNDATION USAFOUNDATION FOR THE BAN KI-MOON: $100,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE BAN KI-MOONKAIST USA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherKATE & JUSTIN ROSE FOUNDATION INC CO WATSON SLOANE PLLC: $51,680 · Other+27 more: $172,512 · Other+27 morePHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC: $73,284 · InternationalYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY FEET: $500 · Human ServicesCHRIS LONG FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $818 · PhilanthropyLEXISNEXIS RULE OF LAW FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,030 · HealthVAL SKINNER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Health
Education$2,035,248Other$1,339,969International$73,284Human Services$6,000Philanthropy$5,818Crime & Legal$5,000Health$3,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,894,267 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC: $73,284 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKATE & JUSTIN ROSE FOUNDATION INC CO WATSON SLOANE PLLC: $51,680 over 3y, 2.4% of budget625 FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $27,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEXISNEXIS RULE OF LAW FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHRIS LONG FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHAPIN SCHOOL: $1,931 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,027 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAL SKINNER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LPGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVY CLUB: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds PHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds KATE & JUSTIN ROSE FOUNDATION INC CO WATSON SLOANE PLLC ↗
  • Who funds 625 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LEXISNEXIS RULE OF LAW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS LONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK ↗
  • Who funds CHAPIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds VAL SKINNER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE LPGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chi Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Chi Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph