Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$6kEducation$4kHealth$820International$820Human Services$720Housing & Shelter$132
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,429
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGUDAS ISRAEL OF ST LOUIS$3,429
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 76% of grant dollars ($9k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($3k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $180 → 11%YESHIVA YAD AHARON: $90 → 14%TUNNEL2TOWERSORG: $132 → 11%YESHIVANETRABBI YY JACOBSON: $180 → 13%THEYESHIVANET: $180 → 14%GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHANS HOME: $360 → 17%JERUSALEM CHESED OF YESHIVA OHEL MO: $180 → 20%MISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $180 → 11%MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $100 → 21%LEV MODI'IN: $100 → 11%AISH: $90 → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDSOF OLD CITY CHEDER: $180 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBI MEIR SCHUSTER'S HERITAGE HOUSE: $90 → 13%GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHANS HOME: $360 → 17%JERUSALEM CHESED OF YESHIVA OHEL MOSHE: $180 → 20%MISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $180 → 11%LOTEM: $180 → 17%AGUDAS ISRAEL OF ST LOUIS: $3k → 11%LOTEM: $180 → 17%LEV MODIIN: $360 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVOT B'NEI AKIVA: $90 → 17%ESTHER MILLER BAIAS YAAKOV OF STL: $180 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA BNEI A: $90 → 17%TORAH PREP: $180 → 11%TORAH PREP SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $180 → 11%ESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL: $180 → 11%TORAH MITZION KOLLEL: $180 → 11%YERUCHAM LIST (RABBI): $180 → 11%CHABAD OF ST LOUIS: $180 → 11%TORAH MITZION KOLLEL: $180 → 11%CHABAD OF ST LOUIS: $180 → 11%YERUCHAM LISTRABBI: $180 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 24% of all-years giving ($3k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$3k · 13 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5k · 10 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$5k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+54%

Still filing today

10%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23
EducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $720
  • GI
    GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHANS HOME
    2× · 2020–2021 · $720
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $720

Funded once

  • II
    ISRALIGHT INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $360
  • LM
    LEV MODIIN
    one grant, 2020 · $360
  • T
    THEYESHIVANET
    one grant, 2021 · $180
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGUDAS ISRAEL OF ST LOUIS: $3,429 · OtherAGUDAS ISRAEL OF ST LOUISIndividual grant recipient: $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHANS HOME: $720 · OtherGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHANS HOMEIndividual grant recipient: $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+26 more: $5,442 · Other+26 moreMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $360 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $180 · EducationESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $180 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBI MEIR SCHUSTERS HERITAGE HOUSE INC: $90 · EducationLEV MODIIN: $100 · InternationalMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $100 · Health
Other$11,031Education$810International$100Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV MODIIN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBI MEIR SCHUSTERS HERITAGE HOUSE INC: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds LEV MODIIN ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBI MEIR SCHUSTERS HERITAGE HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Robert Hardcastle Charitable Fndn Inc · Fredman Family Charitable Trust · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn?

    Find your warmest path to Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chesed V'Emet the Avigdor Ben Yosef Family Fdtn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph