Skip to content
Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation

The organization's mission is to promote breast cancer awareness, detection and treatment, and educate the public.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$377kHuman Services$27k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $75,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $78,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE$38,000
LOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK$20,000
LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS$9,000
THE III B'S FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $38k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $15k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $12k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $8k → 4%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $8k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 7 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$379k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +92%
  • NH
    NOVANT HEALTH INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +643%
  • LB
    LOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Uva Prince William Health System

Uva prince william health system ("pwhs") is part of the uva community health enterprise, an integrated network of not-for-profit, tax-exempt entities that includes physician offices, outpatient facilities and community medical centers.…

—
3
Wellmont Health System

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.Ballad Health is dedicated to improving the health of the 29-county Appalachian Highlands region.

Health
4
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
5
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
6
Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
7
Loudoun Healthcare Foundation

Undertake and assist in the identification, cultivation, encouragement and solicitation of all types of gifts and the management of trust and endowment funds for the benefit of inova loudoun hospital

—
8
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
9
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
11
Novant Medical Group Inc

Our cause we create a healthier future and bring remarkable experiences to life. discover we consistently seek to innovate, courageously transform ourselves and find new ways to add value for our patients, communities and one another.…

—
12
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loudoun Hospital Center Dba Inova Loudoun Hospital; the most unlike its peers is The Iiib's Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOVANT HEALTH INC: $75,000 · HealthNOVANT HEALTH INCLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK: $58,000 · HealthLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORKUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $35,000 · HealthUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INCINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES: $30,000 · HealthINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICESBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INCLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM: $52,000 · Human ServicesLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTI…LOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherLOUDOUN HOSPI…The IIIB's Foundation: $24,000 · OtherThe IIIB's Fo…
Health$198,000Human Services$157,000Other$49,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNOVANT HEALTH INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK: $58,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM: $52,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe IIIB's Foundation: $24,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home