Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation

The organization's mission is to promote breast cancer awareness, detection and treatment, and educate the public.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$198kHuman Services$157kOther$49k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $75,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $78,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE$38,000
LOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK$20,000
LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS$9,000
THE III B'S FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $38k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $20k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $15k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $9k → 4%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $12k → 16%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $8k → 4%LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS: $8k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$379k · 7 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$379k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +92%
  • NH
    NOVANT HEALTH INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +643%
  • LB
    LOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Uva Prince William Health System

Uva prince william health system ("pwhs") is part of the uva community health enterprise, an integrated network of not-for-profit, tax-exempt entities that includes physician offices, outpatient facilities and community medical centers.…

3
Wellmont Health System

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.Ballad Health is dedicated to improving the health of the 29-county Appalachian Highlands region.

Health
4
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

5
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

6
Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

7
Loudoun Healthcare Foundation

Undertake and assist in the identification, cultivation, encouragement and solicitation of all types of gifts and the management of trust and endowment funds for the benefit of inova loudoun hospital

8
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
9
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
11
Novant Medical Group Inc

Our cause we create a healthier future and bring remarkable experiences to life. discover we consistently seek to innovate, courageously transform ourselves and find new ways to add value for our patients, communities and one another.…

12
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loudoun Hospital Center Dba Inova Loudoun Hospital and the most unlike its peers is The Iiib's Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NOVANT HEALTH INC — $75,000 · HealthNOVANT HEALTH INCLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK — $58,000 · HealthLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORKUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $35,000 · HealthUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INCINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $30,000 · HealthINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICESBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INCLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM — $52,000 · Human ServicesLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTI…LOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL — $25,000 · OtherLOUDOUN HOSPI…The IIIB's Foundation — $24,000 · OtherThe IIIB's Fo…
Health$198,000Human Services$157,000Other$49,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNOVANT HEALTH INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN BREAST HEALTH NETWORK — $58,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetLOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM — $52,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN HOSPITAL CENTER DBA INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe IIIB's Foundation — $24,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cherry Blossom Breast Cancer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph