Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc

To lead a network of partners and unite the community to eliminate hunger by feeding, nourishing, and empowering those we serve.

$17k
Granted FY2018
3
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPING HANDS ENDING HUNGER$10,350
VALLEY VIEW STORE HOUSE$3,500
JOYFULL SOUND$3,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JOYFULL SOUND: $4k → 12%VALLEY VIEW STORE HOUSE: $4k → 13%HELPING HANDS ENDING HUNGER: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Just Us Ministires Inc

Providing groceries for those in need without cost to them for floyd, harralson, and polk counties in georgia and cleburne and cherokee counties in alabama

Human Services
2
Inman Methodist Food Pantry

Food pantry

Food & Nutrition
3
Good Samaritan of Manchester Tn Inc

Food bank

4
Community Share Ministry Co

Community Share's mission is to feed, clothe, and house people in need within the Polk County, GA and surrounding communities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
6
Vermillion County Christian Food Center

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
7
Christian Community Ministries of Kershaw County

Christian Community Ministries is a financial crisis ministry helping those who fall within our definition of crisis. Except for one paid administrator, we are a totally volunteer organization. We operate as an extension of the servant…

Religion
8
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
9
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
10
Christian Service Center Inc

Receive donations and disburse to needy.

Human Services
11
Vanceboro Christian Help Center

To provide assistance to needy individuals and families in our community by way of mobile food pantry.

Religion
12
Christian Community Cupboard

Reduce hunger and provide food to families in need.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Alexius Outreach Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Cleveland State Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%5%<5yr16%15%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr13%18%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr15%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr13%100%20–35yr16%0%35–55yr15%0%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/92
the rest of the field
14%
325/2,302

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20182025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
15/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,350 · EducationTRION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCVALLEY VIEW STORE HOUSE — $3,500 · OtherVALLEY VIEW STORE HOUSEJOYFULL SOUND — $3,500 · OtherJOYFULL SOUND
Education$10,350Other$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Northwest Georgia IncGA41.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Georgia Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · North Georgia Electric Membership Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Chattanooga · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · George R Johnson Family Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Faithhope & Charity Recycle Store Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2424

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $33M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph