· Private foundation
Chasdei Zahavi Foundation
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k23 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHABAD LUBAVITCH | $13,790 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,080 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,350 |
| JEWISH EDUCATIONAL MEDIA - JEM | $2,500 |
| CAMP GAN ISRAEL | $1,450 |
| CHABAD OF WATERLOO | $1,360 |
| BETH RIVKAH SCHOOLS | $1,360 |
| MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $1,036 |
| BONEI OLAM | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $946 |
| SINAI SCHOOLS | $721 |
| TZIVOS HASHEM | $600 |
| JCM | $540 |
| MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER | $540 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $414 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +151% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CLCHABAD LUBAVITCH2× · 2022–2023 · $18k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2018–2022 · $10k
- COCHABAD OF THE HAMPTONS2× · 2021–2022 · $4k
Funded once
- CBCONGREGATION BAIS SHIMONone grant, 2018 · $6k
- MLMERKOS LINYONEI CHINUCH CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GEORGIA INCone grant, 2018 · $5k
- CIChayenu Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +46%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education
Education
Religious School
Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts
Operation of a religious elementary school with aproximately 50 children enrolled
To provide hebrew religious and secular education for elementary children in a warm and nurturing environment
The Organization operates an religious outreach center to promote and understand Judaism and the laws of Kosher.
Preschool providing jewish and general education studies
To enrich the youth in the educational understandings of the jewish traditions and religion.
To provide high quality jewish religious and secular education
The organization was created to promote Jewish study, provide Jewish education & strengthen religion in the Jewish community. The two main programs that are currently running are a summer sleepaway camp for teenage boys and a Talmudic…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Lavie Shterna Popack Family Foundat · National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Chasdei Zahavi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chasdei Zahavi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Chasdei Zahavi’s filings →