How much did CHAS AND RUTH SELIGMAN grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of CHAS AND RUTH SELIGMAN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

giftunrestrictedchildrens

2020

giftunrestrictedparishnkycovingtonchildrens

2021

madonna

2022

scholarship postpost secondarysecondary education

2023

urbanscholarship postpost secondarysecondary education

2024

scholarship postpost secondarysecondary educationchildrens

2025

scholarship postpost secondarysecondary education

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $52k
$10k–50k18 grants · $223k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC$50,000
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$20,000
LIFE LEARNING CENTER$20,000
DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDRENS HOME$20,000
HOSEA HOUSE$15,000
THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY$15,000
FAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY$12,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY'S WILDERNES$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
MILESTONES$10,000
MASTER PROVISIONS$10,000
SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC$10,000
THE VICTORIAN AT RIVERSIDE$10,000
UP SPRING$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 34 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%

+53%

Still filing today

24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TM
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY
4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +9%
DC
DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDRENS HOME
3× · 2021–2024 · $51k · revenue +17%
CU
CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY
5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +21%

Funded once

ST
ST TIMOTHY CHURCH
one grant, 2021 · $20k
BC
BOONE COUNTY CASA
one grant, 2021 · $10k
HN
HORIZON NKY COVID RELIEF FUND
one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Kvc Behavioral Healthcare Kentucky Inc

To enrich and enhance the lives of children and their families by providing medical and behavioral healthcare, social services and education.

Health

Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal

Middle Kentucky Community Action Partnership Inc

To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.

—

Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

—

Healthpoint Family Care Inc

Provide primary care medical, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Dental services, Vision, Mental Health and Substance abuse to the under and uninsured populations in several counties in the State of Kentucky.

Health

Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Provide comfortable retirement living and care to residents in a secure, christian environment.

Human Services

Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc

To assist at risk students to graduate from high school and successfully transition to work or further education

Education

Centerpointe Inc

To help people with mental health diagnoses and substance abuse get better, sooner, for longer.

Health

Counterpoint Inc

Counterpoint offers intensive and standard work/day services and supported employment services. Counterpoint also offers three types of residential services: intensive group home, standard group home, and independent living supports.

—

Central Louisville Community Ministries

To minister to the needs of low income residents of the central louisville area.

—

Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

To help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life through job creation, placement, addressing barriers to employment, and other training.

Employment

United Way of Kentucky Inc

As a focused team of leaders, united way of kentucky will align resources and work to advance education, income and health.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Learning Grove Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Pointarc of Northern Kentucky. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

11%

187/1,666

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

17/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,029,644Education$123,500Health$113,500Human Services$52,000Religion$11,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Horizon Community Funds of Northern · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The R C Durr Foundation Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Butler Foundation · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008 · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Duke Energy Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHAS AND RUTH SELIGMAN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: REVIV FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 471013123 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on REVIV FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Chas and Ruth Seligman?

Find your warmest path to Chas and Ruth Seligman through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHAS AND RUTH SELIGMAN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chas and Ruth Seligman?

More from the funding graph

CHAS AND RUTH SELIGMAN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chas and Ruth Seligman?

More from the funding graph