Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles W & Patrica S Bidwill Foundati

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.1MHealth$457kArts & Culture$230kHousing & Shelter$97kRecreation & Sports$69kInternational$50kYouth Development$35kHuman Services$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $449k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $687k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THRIVE SCHOLARS$200,000
BANDWITH MUSIC LTD$160,000
MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE$77,000
CRISTO REY ST MARTIN$50,000
BIG SHOULDERS$50,000
MOMENTUM$50,000
IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP$50,000
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP$50,000
MIDTOWN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$40,000
FRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION$37,000
ARRUPE COLLEGE OF LOYOLA$30,000
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
PROVIDENCE ST MEL SCHOOL$25,000
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $77k → 14%NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $70k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 26 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$2.9M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

38%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THRIVE SCHOLARS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +152%
  • BM
    BANDWITH MUSIC LTD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $230k · revenue +31%
  • ML
    MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $177k · revenue +184%

Funded once

  • ST
    SISTER THEA BOWMAN BLACK CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +65%
  • SC
    SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RV
    RANCHIN' VETS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education
2
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
3
Tutoring Chicago

Tutoring chicago delivers the power of education through one-to-one tutoring.

Arts & Culture
4
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
11
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
12
The Lang School

Founded to educate and inspire gifted and precocious learners who require special social, emotional, executive function and academic supports to realize their high potential, in the greater new york city area, for students grades 1 through…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thrive Scholars; the most unlike its peers is Sister Thea Bowman Black Catholic Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $298,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPBIG SHOULDERS: $275,000 · OtherBIG SHOULDERSCRISTO REY ST MARTIN: $220,000 · OtherCRISTO REY ST MARTINPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $150,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORKMOMENTUM: $130,000 · OtherMOMENTUMLEO HIGH SCHOOL: $110,000 · OtherLEO HIGH SCHOOLSISTER THEA BOWMAN FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $80,000 · OtherProvidence St Mel School: $80,000 · Other+17 more: $449,500 · Other+17 moreMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $255,000 · EducationMidtown-Metro Achie…THRIVE SCHOLARS: $240,000 · EducationTHRIVE SCHOLARSGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationBANDWITH MUSIC LTD: $230,000 · Arts & CultureMYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $177,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $97,000 · Housing & ShelterFRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD: $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 · International
Other$1,887,500Education$520,000Arts & Culture$230,000Human Services$230,000Housing & Shelter$97,000Youth Development$72,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $255,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS: $240,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBANDWITH MUSIC LTD: $230,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetMYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $177,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $150,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $97,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $80,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD: $37,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $32,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE: $20,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSISTER THEA BOWMAN BLACK CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetWEST SIDE CONNECTOR: $12,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRANCHIN' VETS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Midtown-Metro Achievement Centers ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BANDWITH MUSIC LTD ↗
  • Who funds MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HEART RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SISTER THEA BOWMAN BLACK CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CONNECTOR ↗
  • Who funds RANCHIN' VETS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL18.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Hfs Chicago Scholars · WP & HB White Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Cuneo Foundation · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · Fred J Brunner Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles W & Patrica S Bidwill Foundati funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles W & Patrica S Bidwill Foundati. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Center for Children and Families: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles W & Patrica S Bidwill Foundati’s filings →

More from the funding graph