Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of CHARLES & MABEL P JOST FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT$20,000
SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS$10,000
FAIRFIELD PREPARATORY SCHOOL$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN - SPRINGFIELD$5,000
LAHEY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
FRANKLIN PIERCE UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS CT & RI REGION$5,000
THOMAS MERTON CENTER$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP$3,000
THE KENNEDY CENTER INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
CT
KY
VA
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 30 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fairfield University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +63%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +84%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +158%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    University of Saint Joseph

    The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

    Education
    2
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    3
    Western New England University

    Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

    Education
    4
    Fairleigh Dickinson University

    Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

    Education
    5
    Providence College

    See schedule oprovidence college is a catholic, dominican, liberal arts institution of higher education and a community committed to academic excellence.

    Education
    6
    Seton Hall University

    Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

    7
    Bridgton Hospital

    To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

    Health
    8
    Saint John's University

    To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

    9
    Quinnipiac University

    To build the university of the future with a strategy propelling us from our storied past toward an ambitious, inclusive & innovative future by preparing graduates as enlightened global citizens equipped for the challenges & opportunities…

    Education
    10
    Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

    Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

    Health
    11
    St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

    We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

    12
    Georgian Court University

    Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    05the grantee network

    18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    18/18
    Grantees still filing
    14/18
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT — $180,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONTHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $81,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYLAHEY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER — $45,000 · OtherLAHEY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTERCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN RED CROSS CT & RI REGION — $45,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS CT & RI REGIONFAIRFIELD PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $45,000 · OtherFAIRFIELD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $36,000 · OtherTHE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC — $27,000 · OtherADELBROOK INC — $27,000 · OtherCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC — $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,000 · OtherAHLBIN CENTERS FOR REHABILITATION MEDICINE — $27,000 · Other+6 more — $78,000 · Other+6 moreFairfield University — $180,000 · EducationFairfield UniversitySACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $90,000 · EducationSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPOR…UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $64,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS IN…Franklin Pierce University — $45,000 · EducationFranklin Pierce UniversityTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $45,000 · HealthTHE SHRIN…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 · HealthST JUDE C…THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 · HealthTHE TINY …FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC — $18,000 · Human ServicesHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $27,000 · Recreation & SportsEMERGE INC — $24,000 · Food & Nutrition
    Other$726,000Education$379,000Health$112,000Human Services$36,000Recreation & Sports$27,000Food & Nutrition$24,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFairfield University — $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $64,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetFranklin Pierce University — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetADELBROOK INC — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC — $27,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGE INC — $24,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BRIDGEPORT SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE OF PROBATE JUDGES — $9,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Fairfield University
    • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    • Who funds CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds Franklin Pierce University
    • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    • Who funds THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds THE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC
    • Who funds ADELBROOK INC
    • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    • Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC
    • Who funds EMERGE INC
    • Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds GREATER BRIDGEPORT SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC
    • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE OF PROBATE JUDGES

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Peoples United Community FoundationCT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Peoples United Community Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Inner-City Foundation for Charity & Education Inc · Ernest and Joan Trefz Foundation · The Near and Far Association Inc · The Aiello Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
    • The Kennedy Collective Inc79% of income from government
    • Boys and Girls Village Inc32% of income from government
    • Emerge Inc30% of income from government
    • Adelbrook Inc9% of income from government
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
    • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc4% of income from government
    • Greater Bridgeport Symphony Society Inc3% of income from government
    • Sacred Heart University Incorporated1% of income from government
    • Fairfield University1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    1rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Charles & Mabel P Jost Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph