Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles H Pearson Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$249kReligion$195kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kYouth Development$110kHealth$89kInternational$83kPhilanthropy$78kEducation$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON$15,000
COTTING SCHOOL FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN$15,000
YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON$15,000
ALL SAINTS PARISH$15,000
EPISCOPAL CITY MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $12k → 8%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $15k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $30k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $30k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $11k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $15k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $11k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $15k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $15k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $11k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $11k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $10k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $5k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $10k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $6k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $5k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $5k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $3k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $11k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $11k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $10k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $10k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 13 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$1.0M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+44%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +46%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +45%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES AND
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NS
    NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    ST CLAIR COURT PUBLIC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
3
Old Colony Young Men's Christian Association Inc

Old colony ymca helps children, families, and individuals develop to their fullest potential. we respond to ever-changing community needs and view our services through three lenses: youth development, healthy living, and social…

Human Services
4
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc

Our mission is to always welcome and connect young people and families to opportunities that embrace diversity, nurture growth, and inspire success.

Youth Development
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Bangor Young Men's Christian Association

The bangor region ymca is a community leader in supporting children, adults, and families in their lifelong quest for physical, emotional, and social wellness.

Human Services
8
Meriden-New Britain-Berlin Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The meriden-new britain-berlin ymca seeks to become a 'master link' in our communities to enhance the quality of life for all people who live and work in meriden, new britain and berlin. the meriden-new britain-berlin ymca provides all…

Human Services
9
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
10
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
11
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
12
Hockomock Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The hockomock area ymca (hereinafter referred to as "the ymca") is a not-for-profit charitable organization committed to enhancing the quality of life of our members and enriching the communities we serve through partnership and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United South End Settlements; the most unlike its peers is The Metrowest Free Medical Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SAINTS PARISH: $112,546 · OtherALL SAINTS PARISHIndividual grant recipient: $106,273 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOSTON SEAMAN'S FRIEND SOCIETY INC: $82,546 · OtherBOSTON SEAMAN'S FRIEND SOCIETY INCEPISCOPAL CITY MISSION: $82,546 · OtherEPISCOPAL CITY MISSIONBROOKLINE COMMUNITY FUND: $77,546 · OtherBROOKLINE COMMUNITY FUNDMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $45,046 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDCOTTING SCHOOL FOR HANDICAPPED: $33,773 · OtherCOTTING SCHOOL FOR HANDICAPPED+4 more: $50,000 · Other+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $124,546 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Const…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $112,546 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GR…THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $107,546 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INCUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $28,773 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTSNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $110,046 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…Children's Hospital Corporation: $23,773 · HealthTHE METROWEST FREE MEDICAL PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$590,276Human Services$388,411Youth Development$110,046Health$33,773

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $124,546 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $112,546 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $110,046 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $107,546 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SEAMAN'S FRIEND SOCIETY INC: $82,546 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $28,773 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $23,773 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE METROWEST FREE MEDICAL PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SEAMAN'S FRIEND SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE METROWEST FREE MEDICAL PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles H Pearson Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles H Pearson Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles H Pearson’s filings →

More from the funding graph