Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Charles H Pearson Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.9M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Charles H Pearson Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$140k13%
FY20247$125k0%
FY20239$130k0%
FY202211$145k9%
FY202112$120k0%
FY202013$118k0%
FY201913$121k0%
FY201813$114k0%
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$249kReligion$195kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kYouth Development$110kHealth$89kInternational$83kPhilanthropy$78kEducation$49kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Charles H Pearson Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches$124,54690%
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc$112,54680%
All Saints Parish$112,5469n/a
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc$110,04690%
The Home for Little Wanderers Inc$107,54690%
Boston Seaman's Friend Society Inc$82,54678%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$45,0465n/a
United South End Settlements$28,77350%
Children's Hospital Corporation$23,77350%
Northampton Survival Center Inc$15,00011%
The Metrowest Free Medical Program Inc$10,00016%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($350k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charles H Pearson Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $124,546 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc: $112,546 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: $110,046 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Home for Little Wanderers Inc: $107,546 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Seaman's Friend Society Inc: $82,546 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetUnited South End Settlements: $28,773 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $23,773 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthampton Survival Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Metrowest Free Medical Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charles H Pearson Trust with peer funders

About Charles H Pearson Trust

How much does Charles H Pearson Trust give?
Charles H Pearson Trust reported 8 grants totaling $140,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Charles H Pearson Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (22%), Religion (17%), Public Safety & Disaster (11%).
Who are Charles H Pearson Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ($125k), Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc ($113k), All Saints Parish ($113k).
Does Charles H Pearson Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Charles H Pearson Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charles H Pearson Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Charles H Pearson Trust based?
Charles H Pearson Trust is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles H Pearson’s filings →

More from the funding graph