Skip to content

Louisiana · Private foundation

Charles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$107k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
12
Organizations funded FY2019
33%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Charles Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Acadiana, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Charles Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $107k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
6
’18
8
’19
8
’20
0
’21
1
’22
0
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$21,500
Organizations funded a year
9 to 12
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
6
Total assets, FY2019
$25k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 33% of the organizations Charles Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 37% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201912$85k33%
FY20189$61k11%
FY201710$59kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$2.2MPhilanthropy$1.3MHealth$90kEducation$75kHuman Services$29kAnimals$21kReligion$20kYouth Development$17kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
WY
PA
VA
TN
LA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charles Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWoodberry Forest School: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Land Trust for Tennessee Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHero Hunts Inc: $16,000 over 4y, 18% of budget232-Help Inc: $12,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of the South: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ensworth School: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRossview Elementary PTO: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBig Brothersbig Sisters of Middle Tn: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charles Foundation with peer funders

About Charles Foundation

How much does Charles Foundation give?
Charles Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $106,500 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Charles Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (59%), Philanthropy (34%), Health (2%).
Who are Charles Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Blood Cancer United Inc ($80k), Woodberry Forest School ($40k), The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc ($20k).
Does Charles Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Charles Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charles Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Endowment Foundation, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Charles Foundation based?
Charles Foundation is based in LA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles’ filings →

More from the funding graph