Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles E Benidt Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$9.3MEducation$4.7MReligion$4.5MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$660kCivil Rights$490kFood & Nutrition$230kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
META HOUSE$500,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI$500,000
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER$250,000
JOURNEY HOUSE$200,000
OUR NEXT GENERATION$130,000
LCMS WORLD MISSIONS$120,000
PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER$115,000
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$100,000
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP$100,000
NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH$100,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI$100,000
CONCORDIA SEMINARY ADOPT A STUDENT$80,000
NEW WAY ACADEMY$59,000
AUDIO & BRAIL LITERACY ENHANCEMENT$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $30k → 5%BALANCE INC: $5k → 6%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $30k → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $15k → 5%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 5%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $5.0M → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $550k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $300k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $250k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $250k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $250k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $200k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $200k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $200k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $200k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $200k → 17%SERENITY INNS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
CO
MO
KY
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 21 repeat orgs$792k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$20M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+71%

Still filing today

67%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $678k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +32% · 78% of their budget
  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +26%
  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • Best Buddies International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +87%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portal Inc

To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…

Employment
2
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
3
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
4
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
5
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
8
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
9
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
10
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
11
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
12
Sunshine House Inc

Sunshine resources of door county enriches lives to nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $6,600,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INCJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC+5 more: $155,000 · Human ServicesDESERT FOOTHILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH INC: $2,000,000 · OtherDESERT FOOTHILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH INCMETA HOUSE INC: $1,095,000 · OtherMETA HOUSE INCPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $1,075,000 · OtherPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INCMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI: $600,000 · OtherMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WILCMS WORLD MISSIONS: $600,000 · OtherLCMS WORLD MISSIONSCONCORDIA SEMINARY ADOPT-A-STUDENT: $380,000 · OtherCONCORDIA SEMINARY ADOPT-A-STUDENTNEW WAY ACADEMY: $365,719 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY - PHOENIX: $276,500 · Other+19 more: $597,500 · Other+19 moreTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,750,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL …MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $500,000 · EducationMCPREPARATOR…+2 more: $7,500 · EducationPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $1,920,000 · ReligionPHOENIX GO…+3 more: $15,000 · ReligionPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $915,000 · HealthAUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC: $120,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthNew Pathways For Youth: $660,000 · Crime & LegalOUR NEXT GENERATION INC: $490,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$7,755,000Other$6,989,719Education$2,257,500Religion$1,935,000Health$1,037,000Crime & Legal$660,000Civil Rights$490,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $6,600,000 over 5y, 78% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $1,920,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,750,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $1,095,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $1,075,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $915,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $660,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $500,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUR NEXT GENERATION INC: $490,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetNEW WAY ACADEMY: $365,719 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $135,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC: $120,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGolden Opportunities Partnerships Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBalance Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSafe Passage Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBENEDICT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIND RIVER MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR NEXT GENERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW WAY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Golden Opportunities Partnerships Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SERENITY INNS INC ↗
  • Who funds Balance Inc ↗
  • Who funds Safe Passage Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Melitta S and Joan M Pick Charitable Trust · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles E Benidt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles E Benidt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles E Benidt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Charles E Benidt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles E Benidt’s filings →

More from the funding graph