· Private foundation
Charles D Jacobus Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $90k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $305k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN | $33,325 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE | $30,000 |
| KIDS FORWARD | $17,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION | $15,000 |
| PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC | $15,000 |
| COLLEGE POSSIBLE | $15,000 |
| RED ARROW FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC | $15,000 |
| PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER | $15,000 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| TEN CHIMNEY'S FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| COA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTERS | $15,000 |
| CATHEDRAL CENTER | $15,000 |
| LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +54%
- PCPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +18%
TEN CHIMNEYS FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +4%
Funded once
AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +3%- KSKRADWELL SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +26%
WALNUT WAY CONSERVATION CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +96%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…
Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
ArtWorks mission is preparing youth for tomorrow by providing transferable career skills through arts internships today. More than 1,450 high school students have completed ArtWorks internships since our inception.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.
The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.
Legacy redevelopment corporation (lrc) is a non-profit community development financial institution (cdfi) revolving loan fund whose mission is to enhance neighborhood vitality, facilitate a sustainable and economically diverse community,…
To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.
Making the arts accessible to all
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walnut Way Conservation Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Robert Conner Dawes Fund Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEN CHIMNEYS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARTS AT LARGE INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE SKOOL INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Safe & Sound Inc ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE TENNIS AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROBERT CONNER DAWES FUND LTD ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NIA IMANI FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS MATTER INC ↗
- Who funds SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN WOMEN'S BUSINESS INITIATIVE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Weiss Family Foundation · Brewers Community Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles D Jacobus Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.